no, ur good
2007-03-08 09:57:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Big deal so there is a lot to evaluate here.
Street Wickman
Ortiz Helton
Willingham Beltran
Duke **EMPTY**
part 1 - Street vs. Wickman Street wasn't great last year, but the kid is very talented. Wickman is really aging. On a ten-point scale, Street 6.5, Wickman 3.5
part 2 - Ortiz vs. Helton Ortiz is a top-10 player. Helton underachieved last year, but is still talented and plays in Colorado. Not as big a disparity as one would think. Ortiz 6, Helton 4
part 3 - Willingham vs. Beltran Beltran is good. Willingham may be in for a breakout year, but not quite Beltran yet. Beltran 7, Willingham 3
part 4 - Duke vs. EMPTY Duke was weak last year, but as shown by two years ago he has the potential for greatness. Your opposition will pick someone up, but I'll give Zach the benefit of the doubt. Duke 7.5, EMPTY 2.5
You - 23 pts Opponent - 17 pts
Take the deal. I say this is a clear cut improvement.
2007-03-08 10:02:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Beast8981 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its pretty close. I personally would not do it because of Helton being the wild card (he could have a really good season) I would probobly get a better OF then Josh Willingham in the deal and it could be fair.
2007-03-08 10:08:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Platlander 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That is too many players to look at without knowing the rest of the team.
But usually first round draft picks get moved because of bad draft choices that follow. If you planned your team around the Beltran draft then adding Ortiz may open up holes that you weren't planning on and didn't draft for.
2007-03-08 10:33:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by EnormusJ69 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes
2007-03-10 08:09:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jake 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
without seeing your team, its hard to say. but i think i would look at it this way.
ortiz > beltran
street > wickman
willingham+duke >/= helton
2007-03-08 09:56:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by what? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hope this is a rhetorical question... the answer is obviously YES
2007-03-08 10:26:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ruthless 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
of course
2007-03-08 10:11:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Brian M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
YES!!!
2007-03-08 11:31:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by ne1_c_my_head 2
·
0⤊
0⤋