English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

History of Armoured Warfare

2007-03-08 09:31:59 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities History

6 answers

In 1939, during the Soviet-Finnish Winter War, the Finnish armoured forces consisted of around thirty-two obsolete Renault FT-17 tanks, some Vickers-Carden-Lloyd Mk. IVs and Model 33s, which were equipped with machine guns, and 26 Vickers Armstrongs 6-ton tanks.

2007-03-08 09:54:12 · answer #1 · answered by Captain Hammer 6 · 1 0

And a "T71" is what precisely? in case you propose T-seventy two, then you definately're watching what an Abrams eats for breakfast in the previous lunching on the Soviet/chinese language equipped enemy's rear factors. You for sure missed each M1 (and variations) engagement from the Gulf conflict till immediately. The M1s in no way ran away, they ran OVER their opposition. They even carry out properly in city battling, something the T-seventy two could no longer do in Chechnya battling the best comparable enemy. No M1 (M1A1/M1A2SEP) has ever lost to a T-fifty 5, T-sixty two, T-seventy two or the different tank. Even our Bradley IFVs kill T-72s faily in many circumstances. the only time an M1 has moved removed from a POS-seventy two is to clean the gun-objective line for different weapon structures to kill it while the M1 is bored. Why? we've the desirable crews and the very desirable tank interior the worldwide (and it keeps getting greater desirable). Enemy T-72s look genuine mind-blowing merely after our sabot around exits the rear and the turrets pop-off. And if 3 T-72s line up in collumn, the sabot is going by all 3 front to back!! Sorry, T-72s (or POS-72s) lose every time. The M1 and its cousins, the united kingdom Challenger MBT and German Leopard II MBT, are the desirable tanks interior the worldwide and have the main experienced crews. and that i say that once working with Russian ABN in Bosnia and dissimilar militaries worldwide extensive. the main dificult area is coping with the barriers of a T-seventy two while this is allied. I additionally relish no longer having to in wonderful condition interior that coffin of a T-seventy two turret and understanding any sturdy spark can set off off the carrasel ammo rack, or worring correct to the slow advert airborne dirt and dirt vehicle-loader takming my arm off. The M1 consistently introduced me homestead, alive. nevertheless I even have in no way worked with Aussie and Canadian Armor gadgets so i won't remark on them. yet i be attentive to Aussie Diggers are a bone to be chewed and am chuffed they're on my area.

2016-12-14 14:12:22 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

they used some vickers built tanks that they had bought in the UK and also some tank that they had gained on the Russian army
But the term main battle tank isn't correct this is a termination that is only used after the WW 2 and the first real main battle tank that will fall under that this term is the centurion tank

2007-03-09 06:16:36 · answer #3 · answered by general De Witte 5 · 0 0

If memory serves they were British tanks, vickers 6 tons plus a bunch of captured Russian T26s. .

I have a Finn M39 rifle from that war. It started out life as a Russian M1891, then the Finns rebarreled them and put them in new stocks, sights etc.

2007-03-08 09:45:12 · answer #4 · answered by DJ 7 · 0 0

To the best of my knowledge, the Finnish did not possess anything that could be considered a Main Battle Tank. That was why they were forced to fight a defensive battle against the invading Russians. But they fought valiantly and skillfully and inflicted massive casualties on them.

2007-03-08 09:42:35 · answer #5 · answered by rohak1212 7 · 0 0

A large chunk of them had nothing more than skis and a rifle.

2007-03-08 12:18:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers