English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

Because if you change 2 parameters, you don't know which caused the potential change in outcome.

2007-03-08 09:21:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Well, the reason is simple. If you control everything but 1 parameter, then you can be absolutely certain that any change in outcome was due to THAT parameter.

2007-03-09 13:11:39 · answer #2 · answered by Michael Dino C 4 · 0 0

You need to be able to point to the one difference that caused a different outcome.

If you change two factors, you won't know which one caused the different outcome.

2007-03-08 17:23:04 · answer #3 · answered by ecolink 7 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers