No, for all that means is that you are not in intense sexual competition to pass your seed on to the next generation
2007-03-08 09:22:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Experto Credo 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I really think so, I'd need to see them in order to judge how small they really are.
2007-03-08 09:09:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by the_bi_guy_in_MI 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Depends on how small they really are. If they are small marble size, maybe. (have to see it to believe it).
2007-03-08 08:43:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Çåŗőľîņẫ§ħŷġĭ®ł 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
be sure to use a high-resolution setting on the camera so i can blow up the pic
2007-03-08 08:54:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's not necessary if you say the exact size.
Besides, why are you thinking they are little?
2007-03-08 08:50:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by whole_feelings 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Nope. They couldn't be any smaller than my ex's anyway.
2007-03-08 13:17:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by hotspringsjamie 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
sure why not i like to see things i/ve never seem before
2007-03-08 08:31:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
sure! why not? i mean if theyre that small e mail me
2007-03-08 11:04:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
sure why not nothing i haven't seen before
2007-03-08 09:14:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jessie S 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
umm no not really. Sucks for you though.
2007-03-08 09:22:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by B20Mac 4
·
0⤊
1⤋