Tha't will be a great experience for all the american people.
2007-03-08 08:16:13 · 17 answers · asked by LULU 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
No way in hedoubletoothpicks.
She has an uncontrollable temper, she has been surrounded by yes-men and people who will do anything to protect her. Her 'little chats' with people are very strictly controlled and if you claim your question is one thing and you ask something that is 'off limits' i.e., Bill's numerous transgressions, Filegate, Rose Law Firm, Vince Foster, her failed health care initiative, you will have your microphone cut off and be hustled away from it and not allowed to ask any questions.
Why should she be elected? What has she done in Congress? What has she done at all? Why is she qualified? Has she initiated any Congressional bills that have actually been voted on? Have they been passed? Has she been the sole author or has she piggybacked her name onto someone with more credibility?
Why should I be stupid enough to vote for someone just because they are female or male, or white or black or Hispanic or Democrat or Republican? I'd rather research the issues and policies and find out just what they really think and believe, see what their voting history has been.
That being said, I find the arrogance of Barak Obama to think he can run this nation on his experience of less than two years in national office, a good deal of which he has not been in Washington but has been flitting around the nation drumming up support. If I were in his constituency, I would be seriously upset with him. He's not looking out for my area, he's out self-promoting.
And why in the world would you want to have a different president for the 'experience'? Are you nuts? I want a strong president who will protect my family and nation first. I do not want my government to be an 'experiment' for the pleasure of some sociological wet dream.
2007-03-08 08:27:36 · answer #1 · answered by susancnw 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
not in 2012. Obama could be a sitting president then (different than a tragedy happens contained interior the period in-between) and as Ted Kennedy proved with Jimmy Carter, it somewhat is impossible to united statesa. an incumbent president contained interior the primaries, even on an identical time as he's screwing up miserably! Hillary will might opt to attend until a minimum of 2016 -- and with slightly of luck until you-understand-the area freezes over!
2016-10-17 21:40:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I do not think all "womes" should vote for Senator Clinton.
And it'd be an experience if she WAS elected, but I wouldn't say it would be a good one!
2007-03-08 08:37:58 · answer #3 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, lets get out there and get the wome vote.
2007-03-08 09:01:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Women isn't Hillary problem its going to be getting those men votes.
2007-03-08 08:24:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think she is an old mare now, that the American public has seen enough of her and the Clintons and that we need some fresh air. Sorry, IMHO, she does not stand a chance
2007-03-08 08:49:18 · answer #6 · answered by Miss Debout 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If she only gets votes from Womes, she won't get elected so it doesn't matter.
Will all women vote for her? No. I won't, not that I think she will get through the primaries.
2007-03-08 08:27:26 · answer #7 · answered by Elizabeth Howard 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I didn't know Hillary was a womes?
2007-03-08 08:25:51 · answer #8 · answered by Ricky 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
NO....you need to vote for the best! I'm a women an in my opinion I would not vote for her due to her morals not because of her sex.
2007-03-08 08:27:28 · answer #9 · answered by busygoddess 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Only if Hillary is the best candidate.
2007-03-08 08:20:10 · answer #10 · answered by nora22000 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋