It is a distinction awarded for quantity, not quality. No thanks.
2007-03-08 07:39:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by john_stolworthy 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
It is rather rediculous, isn't it? It doesn't mean anything, but to try and make people more addicted to the site. It's called manipulation. "Ooh, I feel good because I answered so many questions. Yahoo! must like me!" Total crap, I say. Oops, I got "top contributor" for politics, but I didn't ask Yahoo! to give it to me.
2007-03-08 15:41:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by xenypoo 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Means nothing to me. And you know it's a joke for sure when you see con after con parroting GOP talking points and yet they also have the 'top contributor' too.
2007-03-08 15:45:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by ck4829 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Top contributor actually shows knowledge in that particular category.
2007-03-08 16:13:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Ha! I'm not one; so I guess I do have a life. I feel better already! I'd give you 10 pts if I could.
2007-03-08 15:39:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, it's giving credit where credit isn't due; typical Yahoo move.
2007-03-08 15:39:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I consider it an idiot tag. I wear mind proudly.
2007-03-08 17:27:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Overt Operative 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Hmmmmm...........hahahahahah!!
2007-03-08 15:54:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by T S 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
LOL, Like I didn't know this already?
2007-03-08 15:41:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Haha! Oh... yeah, maybe.
2007-03-08 15:41:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋