will technology lead us back to the stone age?

Answer 1

Who knows, maybe we've got a thing or two to learn from stone age people. That if they could see how badly we have mistreated our home. Personally, I think our so-called civilization, is overrated. Just look at all the crazy things we do. I think it's time we get our bearings , and get our priorties straight. The freshening and desalination of our oceans due to global warming, will make the oceans conveyor belt go to sleep so to speak. All inlands will suffer severe droughts, vegetation, will die, crops will fail, the people and animals who depend on those things will die. And then the people and anfimals who depend on the animals who eat the dissappearing vegetation, will die as well. But if we started to use our technology for good there are probably many ways to help prevent , and intervene in this event. We ought to put the criminals to work, excavating great big aquafirs, redirecting a lot of the glacial melt off water towards the inlands. This would help irrigate the inland crops immensely even if there wasn't a great freeze coming on. What to we have to lose? Water will be one of our, if not The greatest commodity of the future. And there are a lot of other ways to help reverse the damage being done to the most important thing we have; OUR EARTH! But only where there's a will, is there a way.

Answer 2

Yes, it will but only if we misuse technology can we end up back in the stone age and it wouldn't really be the stone age given that it's just an expression we use today. The term "stone age" is used to express the lack of tools better than the stone-based tools used by early Man.
If humanity was to misuse atomic bombs, get struck by a 10 mile long nickle or iron composited asteroid or kill billions by neglecting global warming, we will find ourselves moving from one location to another without the help of automobiles, dying from hunger, combating worldwide epidemics without proper facilities or medicine... the list can go on an on.
The fact that we won't have the things, tools or the technology we have today to make living easier is what going back to the "stone age" means in this context.

Answer 3

Since we are unsure of the extent to which technology will eventually take us in the future, why do you think we have even actually left the Stone Age? We cannot compare the future of something until we actually know what that futre will be. Perhaps our descendants 2 or 3 billion years from now will look back at today's history and laugh, shake their heads, and wonder how we ever did the things we accomplished up until today.

Answer 4

No.

It is technology that led us OUT of the stone age. It will only be loss of technology that could lead us back. And since technology is based on knowledge, as long as there are people alive who understand technology, we will have it.

But I assume you are talking about war or pollution devastating our civilization. Those things have been devastating civilizations for centuries and we are still advancing to better and better technology.

Answer 5

Technology is what sets the human race apart and I think technology is the only way out of the mess we are right now. Wihtout scientific research we will not be able to stop the serious problems that will affect our planet during the next 100 years. We better improve our technology and do it quickly!

Answer 6

There ought to've been in basic terms one explanation for happiness to height interior the stone age, which replaced into the guy extinction of stupidity by skill of organic determination. whether it replaced into uncertain everyone enjoyed it on account that all of us replaced into dying at thirty years of age. If it is devolution to stay previous thirty and be attentive to extra approximately existence, certainty, and love then i'm going to take devolution every time over its opposite. Misanthropes frequently are continuously present day-day Luddites, for the hatred of technologies is in simple terms yet another hatred for humanity. observe the crass simplification of technologies as allowing in basic terms the potential to artwork and purchase issues, which misses the way it frees up time to be with kinfolk. yet present day idiotic environmental followers assume nature is pristine, and technologies harms it, lacking the certainty that nature is in simple terms serene and captivating right this moment because of the fact we at the instant are not concern to its each whim. How right now are some super reward of technologies assumed, on a similar time as its problems are enumerated to the 10th degree.

Answer 7

I would think that is unlikely. Even in the event of a huge catastrophe which wiped out most of our technology, as long as some people survived then there are ideas that would survive along with them.

Language, writing, the wheel, irrigation, animal husbandry to name a few.

Answer 8

Maybe, read Anthemby Ann Rynd, its a book about all technology being destroyed and forgotten. Then someone finds an ancient lightbulb, and discovers what happen.

Answer 9

No i dont think so but it might cause a major population decrease if we have a nuclear war or something way i see it right now we fixing to have a limited nuclear war in middle east very soon. Irans got to go Israel is gonna send some nukes flying if they dont stop developing nukes

Answer 10

if global warming continues and disrupts ocean currents causing an ice age, than yes.
Or if we had a nuclear war, or ignored a giant asteriod hurtling toward Earth.