English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Halo 1 was great for its time, Halo 2 was disappointing I wasnt as disappointed with the story as I was with the physics,repetitiveness short campaign, cartoonish enemies(those snipers look like ducks) etc had decent multiplayer but no AI which meant coop was the only option for 2 player.
Onto Halo 3 it looks good in the trailers I hope its a return to form heres a few things I would like to see
I would like to see masterchiefs sit put to good use it since it apparently enhances his strength ,reflexes, speed ,shield etc you should be able to alter what it enhances most.Masterchief only had one melee attack in halo 2 I understand its a first person shooter but thats just disappointing especially when you are low on ammo and have to do it repetitively.
I am not with the way the enemies look in Halo with the exception of the elites and drones which just needed more detail I disliked Halo and Halo 2's enemies(I do like the way the brutes have been redesigned to them all)

2007-03-08 06:49:31 · 4 answers · asked by Idealist 5 in Games & Recreation Video & Online Games

I ran out of space in details before I ran out of ideas so Im posting some more,they should definitely add new enemies to stop it feeling like the same game smarter AI(I killed half the Brutes while they were running into walls).I know there will be destructible environments so why not take the next step and make the environment a weapon like in dead rising and throw things.I hope the game has more varied and detailed environments especially in covenant parts of the game where everything looks the same I know part of the game will take place in africa but personally Im hoping its not just there I really want a Snow level like in Lost Planet.As for the weapons the human ones are ok but the covenant ones need to both look real they can still be sci-fi they just need to look possible, especially fix that plasma pistol it does virtually no damage.I also think the pace of the game needs a change in Halo 2 both the vehicles and weapons seem to slow.
Finally fix the vehicle controls.

2007-03-08 07:11:19 · update #1

To all the people who say I dont like Halo that is not true I thought Halo 1 was great,Halo 2 was ok but had a short campaign and didnt add much Im just saying Halo 2 could have been alot better and I hope Halo If I didnt like halo I wouldnt be anticipating with all these ideas.

2007-03-08 07:22:39 · update #2

4 answers

Halo 3 should have a system to take out all the Azzholes in the game's multiplayer

2007-03-08 06:58:24 · answer #1 · answered by Flusher 3 · 0 0

Halo 2 was way better than Halo 1.
Halo 3 will be way better than Halo 2.
I think the features they have already Incorporated into the game are the ones that should be there.

Halo was built for multiplayer. And Halo two was awesome in multiplayer. You can use the energy sword instead of melee attacks if you're short on ammo.

If you don't like the way Halo looks or plays....then maybe you should play a different game.

2007-03-08 06:53:21 · answer #2 · answered by Barrett G 6 · 0 0

Halo 1 was my favorite because the campaign levels were much better and it was just way cooler. Halo 2, I didn't like, like he said Halo 2 is for multiplayer. Playing the Arbiter was really retarted, and the ending made the game even worse! Halo 3 is (in my opinion) going to be much better. The Brutes are supposed to be much more violent, and the graphics are going to be much better as well. Halo has always been my favorite game. If you don't like halo then just find another game for example try Gears of War. It is way fun and way Bloody. I loved it but the Halo series is still the best. I bought my Xbox 360 only for Halo 3 and Gears of War. Besides Halo is made for Mutiplayer, not for single player. I think Halo 3 is going to be the best. It finishes the fights that you started in Halo Combat Evolved and in Halo 2. So if you don't like halo, please don't complain, just find a different shooter such as Gears of War or Resident Evil.

2007-03-08 07:08:59 · answer #3 · answered by T-Bob Squarepants 3 · 0 0

idk. i think halo 2 was good enough. halo 2 was such a big improvement! u could dual wield. u could get more vehicles. and it was online!!!!!!!!!!!!! being able to use the sword! better maps. online was the best thing ever. i started playing online and didnt even bother finishing the campaign. i dont think campaigns and stories are ever good for games.

there are definately enough enemies. three or four enemies are good. i could care less about details in the environment its a shooter! but it is a 360 and halo 2 was made for xbox so graphics and environment should be better and detailed. weapons and vehicles= perfectly fine. mayb take out a couple of weapons and exchange them for new ones. and the plasma pistol is meant to always be held for maximum strength and dual wielded.

2007-03-08 08:19:35 · answer #4 · answered by imputh 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers