Why aren't alternative theories to 9/11 a consideration?

Question

"If the United States is to maintain its preeminence – and the military revolution now underway is already an American-led revolution – the Pentagon must begin in earnest to transform U.S. military forces. ... the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor."
- This is from PNAC. Members include: cheney, rumsfeld, wolfowitz, gates.

Who gained the most from 9/11? honestly?

terrorists: They instilled fear in americans.....um....please add to this in your response

U.S. gov't/global elite: Justification for wars in the middle-east (OIL). the patriot act (which heavily infringes upon OUR bill of rights).

If our gov't asked to put cameras on all our residential streets to watch for terrorists, how many of you would be ok with that?
1984 anyone?

I don't claim to know the truth about 9/11, but having done my OWN research, i can not believe the official story of 911

To answer some of your questions.

I do believe planes hit the towers and i also claimed to not know what really happened only that i dont believe the official story.

to say that the dumbest admin. couldn't do this is not an argument. How do you know that they are dumb? I think Bush is smarter than people give him credit for.

Elway...some things that seem bogus to me...

NORAD and FAA in total confusion whether to send up fighter jets (there were war games going on that day that were eerily similar to the 9/11 attacks)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_games_in_progress_on_September_11,_2001

The put options place on United airlines and american airlines in the days leading up to 9/11.....suggests foreknowledge.

CNN and BBC reporting WTC7 building collapse before it does. no steel-structured building has ever collapsed due to fire.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWtg1he7feo&mode=related&search=
http://www.youtube.com/wat
ch?v=N1LetB0z8_o

Just in case you think these videos are fabricated, BBC responded to the video in an editorial.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs
/theeditors/2007/02/part_o
f_the_conspiracy.html

There are so many questions about that day that are unanswered and it SEEMS to point to complicity by our gov't, but don't believe me, do your own research
http://911scholars.org/
http://stj911.org/

Answer 1

Mr, Orange you are not crazy as some idiots answered you,I lost my father on 9/11 I was 16 years old back then,am doing my own investigation,I know for sure that this operation can not be carried by punch of ignorants from the middle east,I still remember the televised video of Jews dancing in New York while the towers falling,It is impossible for any organization to conduct such an operation at this scale,Now after all these years I believe in one thing that there will come a day all Americans will know what exactly happened and who exactly responsible for this crime,I feel really so bad that Americans have been fooled by its sons,I think Israel is the prime suspect of this historical crime. good work pal,thanks to you God bless America,America's enemy goes to hell....

Answer 2

Yes and the Islamic Fascists are actually really tanned US Government officials with beards and rags around their heads beheading, suicide bombing, and slitting throats in the name of Allah to justify a war. YOU UNEDUCATED IDIOT DO YOU FORGET SEEING THE PLANES HIT THE TOWERS ON 9/11 AND THE EXPLOSIONS AND AN HOUR LATER AFTER MASSIVE DAMAGE THEY FINALLY FELL? ARE YOU THAT SERIOUSLY DUMB TO THINK THE US GOVERNMENT WOULD DO THAT?

There is a reason you do not see a lot of the plane parts if one does crash, the jet fuel does disintegrate a lot of the metal into nothing but ashes, the same goes for the support beams in the towers. Tons and tons of pressure, heat, fire, and jet fuel is enough to take out any structure. Especially a tall standing structure being hit in the upper parts of the building. If you want to blame America for everything go over to Iran and join the terrorists, that is if they don't slit your throat before they allow you to join.

And the Iraq war was not over oil you moron. If that is the case we would have already of moved on by now because we would have had what we wanted and left Iraq to become a terrorist nation like Iran, Syria, and Palestine. We did in fact find hundreds of Saryn gas containers used for WMDs in Iraq, but the idiotic liberals once again not wanting to be proved wrong for their own stupidity, complained that wasn;t what they were told were WMDs. All you want is for America to fall and be taken over by the Islamic Fascists. But when it does happen you will wish you never even had this thought in your head. Especially when they kill your family in the name of Allah before beheading you. DUMBASS!

Answer 3

The problem I have is the alternate theories I've looked at had huge holes in them, or ignored certain key peices of evidence. The problem you'll have with basic research is intel. What did the government know? They can't give things like that away freely, otherwise enemies will know sources. Personally you're right, the terrorists did gain the most, this is why they did it. I wouldn't dump on the government too much, it's tough to protect citizens without prying into privacy or civil rights. It's a very fine line to walk. And if there's another major attack people will blame the government for not doing more.

Answer 4

Ahh, the famous "Pearl Harbor" line from the PNAC report...an excellent example how simple words can be so easily spun into whatever the hell anyone wants them to mean.

Let's say my employer sends out a memo that says "The Company Picnic will be held June 10, unless it rains." By your "logic" if it does rain and the picnic is cancelled, I can assume that the memo proves my employer conspired to cause the rain.

Does that sound like a theory worthy of consideration?

Answer 5

It's not alternative theory, it's a conspiracy theory which libs love to throw around. Yet, they cannot accept the fact that Sandy Burglar stole important documents so the 9/11 commission could not and would not ever see it. Why?? So, no one would look at Clinton and of course the libs are soaking that muddy water up. It's clouding your brain.

Answer 6

You don't sound like the usual conspiracy nut and I was going to answer your question, but then realized my answer hinged upon exactly what it is that you don't believe. You didn't really explain that, so it's hard to look at it from your perspective. If you get a chance, would you add that on? I'm very curious about what seems bogus to you.

Answer 7

I agree completely. If you aren't scared, look at the evidence and it's obviously a cover-up. If you truly care about the truth instead of just pledging alligiance to the lie, please ask yourself who you should be blaming for 9/11. If it was the hi-jackers we were told, they'd be dead. They are NOT. Good luck finding the black box dialogue. You would think at least one transcript from one box would be available on the internet. And I don't mean the bits and pieces. Well hell you would think you could listen to it. Why not? Too graphic? I just saw a worker stabbed in a grocery on the news tonight while she screamed. WHY IS THERE NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE LIE?! It's an insult they don't even fake some **** for me!

Answer 8

excuse me: Why does "the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor."

Mean the government CAUSED an incident? I doubt if the people reading the PNAC piece ever read a word OTHER than the Pearl Harbor reference.

The same people who insist these are the dumbest leaders in history have pulled off the most elaborate hoax ever. And Scooter Libby is on the way to jail because no one can keep a secret about the NAME OF A CIA AGENT.

Just hysterical

Answer 9

You and I think alot alike. These will be the same people who will willingly put chips in their arms a couple of years down the road. It is impossiple for me to believe the officail story as well. There are liteally 100's of ommisions and distortions as Griffin points out. Have you read 9/11 Synthetic Terror? It is really great and I highly recomend it to anyone. Tarpley is truly a brilliant historian.

Answer 10

why does the person who gains the most have to be the one to perform the act.

If I make a move in chess and loose a piece, it is my mistake that caused my opponent to gain. My action, someone elses gain.

The military revolution they discucss is shifting from an infantry to a air powered military.