Your question contradicts Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity which states that no object with mass CAN travel at, or above, the speed of light (c). As your car approaches c, its resistance to acceleration (mass) increases so that it would take an impossibly infinite force to actually reach c. Your question, then, is based on an impossible premise. It's like asking 'What would happen if I reached the North Pole and kept going north?'
As you approach the speed of light with your headlights on, however, you would still measure the light beam racing away from your car at 186,000 miles per second (c). A 'stationary' observer watching this happen, though, would not then measure the beam's speed at almost twice c. Relativity says that all observers always get the same measurement for c.
While that may not sound logical or plausible, it happens because what we normally think of as fixed concepts--length and time--are both variable at high speeds. If you observed a car travelling past you at close to c, its length in the direction of travel would appear shortened and the passage of time on board would appear slowed down.
Although these ideas sound strange to all of us not used to moving at relativistic speeds, they have all been confirmed experimentally.
Answered by: Paul Walorski, B.A. Physics, Part-time Physics Instructor
First of all, you need to realize that when you say you are traveling at the speed of light, that has to be with respect to, or relative to, something else. It is an underlying fundamental assumption of Einstein's special theory of relativity that uniform, non-accelerated motion has no meaning of and by itself. That is, there is, by assumption, no meaning to the idea of moving uniformly at the speed of light in an empty universe. That state is completely equivalent to being at rest in an empty universe..
I preface my answer with this comment because it leads immediately to the answer to the question. Imagine that you are in your car 'traveling at the speed of light' and that you turn on your headlights. That state of motion is utterly equivalent to being at rest in an empty universe. Since, when at rest, the light from your headlights would be launched forward from your car at the speed of light, relative to you, with a certain color spectrum, that is exactly what would happen if somehow you could be moving instead at the speed of light.
In other words, the presence or absence of other objects or matter in the universe relative to which, if present, you could make a determination that you were moving at the speed of light makes absolutely no difference to your own experiences and experiments. The light that you launch behaves in exactly the same way whether the other referential matter exists or not.
This leads into another interesting question, however. And that is whether the rest of the matter (mass) in the universe in some way affects your own local observations. So far this question has come up in relation to theories of gravity. If effect, the question is how does the universal gravitational constant, G, which determines how strongly gravitating masses attract each other, know what value to assume if there is no other mass in the universe. Mach proposed, essentially on philosophical grounds, that G must be determined by the sum total of all of the mass in the universe. Einstein assumed in his General Theory of Relativity that G is simply a universal constant, independent of the specific mass distribution of the universe. On the other hand, Brans and Dicke later proposed a so-called scalar-tensor theory of gravity in which the local value of G depends upon the rest of the mass in the universe through an additional scalar field that does not appear in Einstein's theory.
Answered by: Warren Davis, Ph.D., President, Davis Associates, Inc., Newton, MA USA
2007-03-08 06:24:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by scareyd 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
Nothing, because the speed of light is independent of frame of reference. So if you are inside the car and travelling along at the speed of ZERO relative to the car, the headlights will work fine for you. However, since the Universe is travelling outside the car (in the opposite direction) at the speed of light, for you the universe will have a length of zero, so your headlights will give you a nice beam, but there won't be much to see.
2007-03-08 06:27:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Andre P 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You can't travel that fast but if could get as close to it as possible, the light would leave you at the same speed everyone else measures - the speed of light. Just imagine yourself in an empty part of the universe where you can't see any matter to use as a reference. You would never know how fast you were going.
2007-03-08 06:26:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Gene 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
the easy from the headlight will nonetheless trip on the cost of sunshine and not at two times the cost of sunshine as you will possibly anticipate. In Einstein's concept of relativity, the addition of velocity takes the form, s = (v + u)/(a million + (vu/c^2)) the place v and u are the two velocities to be extra and c is the cost of sunshine. At velocities we regularly go jointly with our on a regular basis adventure, a motor vehicle's velocity for occasion, say 76mi/hr and ninety mi/hr, the equation for s surely boils all the way down to s = u + v --> simply by fact the denominator is approximately equivalent to a million as quickly as you approach relativistic velocities, the denominator will become important. on your question the two v and u equals c, and so the denominator term is comparable to 2 s = (c+c)/2 = 2c/2 s = c
2016-10-17 21:29:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well...you'd probably get a speeding ticket for one thing.
Also you'd be hard pushed to find a car that would go that fast! Not even a Bugatti Veyron can get close to that speed!
And to even THINK of trying to attain speeds like that in the DARK is sheer madness!!
Your quest for speed seems to be bordering on some kind of mental illness, I would seek help as soon as possible.
It is worrying to think that there may be people like you out there on the public roads.
2007-03-08 07:21:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by johncee 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
*Sigh!* This gets asked EVERY week!
The answer is that it would be exactly the same as if you switched them on when you were not moving. That's relativity for you. Anyway, you can't go at the speed of light.
2007-03-08 06:54:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Martin 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
nothing special would happen because you would need to be in a vacum so from inside the car you wouldn't see any light because its is not reflecting off anything thus you counldn't see it
2007-03-08 09:43:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by nurgle69 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nothing because it's impossible to travel that fast. Einstein proved that.
2007-03-08 06:25:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Make sure they`re dipped to avoid dazzling other drivers and you should be ok.
2007-03-08 06:29:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nothing
2007-03-08 06:39:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Norrie 7
·
0⤊
0⤋