How come the jet that crashed in Indonesia didn't vaporize like flights 77 & 93 ??

Question

They found fuselage, wing sections, tail section, engines, landing gear, bodies, seats, luggage...etc.

Answer 1

Because this jet wasnt shot down like Flight 93. And they did find lots of fuselage and other plane parts on 93 its jsut they were scattered around for miles meaning it probably blew up in air not on impact with the ground.

Answer 2

The outcome of a plane crash depends on a lot of things, particularly the angle at which the plane impacts the ground as well as the speed of the plane at the time of impact. Of course, the faster the plane is going, the more force the ground will exert on the plane to counter the force of the plane hitting the ground. Airframes can only take so much force before they break, and a certain amount more before they "vaporize" into smaller bits of metal and the like. Other factors, which would lead to seats and bodies being "vaporized" depend on the extent of fires after the plane crashes, and how quickly those fires can be put out. If I recall correctly, the jet that crashed in Indonesia crashed on landing (or take off, but I'm pretty sure it was landing), at which point it would have a dramatically reduced speed from those of the flights that crashed on 9/11, would have had flaps (and possibly spoilers, which further decrease speed by reducing air over the wings) deployed, and would have impacted the ground at a more gentle angle.

Plane crashes, while rare, however, have relatively high fatality rates for when they do occur. While you may walk away from a car crash with several broken bones, you will ultimately recover. When a plane crashes, you're screwed mainly because of the sheer force involved in the impact, and lack of safety equipment in the plane (that seatbelt isn't doing much except keeping you from literally flying out of your seat).

Answer 3

There was nearly as much wreckage found of both those flights as of the Indonesian flight. You would expect less of 77 as it hit a building, slightly different from landing in a paddy field. Do you know what a paddy field is? It is full of water, different from a hard surface or a reinforced concrete building. You are really struggling to try to compare the crashes. You don't read, do you? You have closed your eyes to the truth in your determination to find a conspiracy.

Also, the Indonesian plane burst into flames after the crash and after more than 100 people got off. Where is the comparison? There are no similarities in the wrecks at all except in your brain.

Answer 4

If you look, you will find that on 9/11 flights # 77 & # 93 were going MUCH FASTER than the one in Indonesia. Speed kills.

Answer 5

I didn't see that they found much of anything in the debris of the two buildings. Meaning no anything bigger than a golfball. It was all ground to rubble. Go to the Popular Mechanics website and search for the 9-11 thing. It refutes your hypothesis.

Answer 6

Did it crash into a 110-story building in New York City on September 11, 2001?

No? Then I guess it's probably not the same thing.

Answer 7

It was flying at a normal speed just like all unintentional plane crashes.

Answer 8

It depends how they crash, what their velocity and direction of flight were, and how hard or soft the crash area is.

Just to disabuse you of any incorrect notions you may have, jet crashes are not all the same.

Answer 9

They did find pieces of flight 93 perhaps you should go read about it here.

Answer 10

It was not flying at 500 miles an hour.