English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

Not only do they have them, we know right where they are

ooops

another lie

2007-03-08 05:17:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

No, not yet. We already know they had them, meaning anthrax, but a large cache hasn't been found yet. It took America, at least 8 years to find the mass graves of Iraqi people, after the first gulf war, with Bush Sr. There is a reason Saddam Hussein didn't want the investigators there. That is why, he's got wmd hidden well. Its a desert for heaven's sake. It will take a long time to find them.

2007-03-08 13:24:34 · answer #2 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 2 0

All I heard George Bush and Rumsfield say before they broke the 2nd Constitution is , "We know right where they are , we can walk in and lay our hands on them". The next I saw about finding WMD was George Bush looking under the drapes in the Oval Office saying, "Where are you, we know your there somewhere". Nothing but a pile of low down LIES.

2007-03-08 15:42:21 · answer #3 · answered by Nicki 6 · 0 0

Yes, Bill Clinton 1998, The CIA, The NSA and British Intelligence....plus a few more. Were they right? It doesnt appear to be, but did Iraq not have them or did they get rid of them while we were all bickering about it? We know he "had" them....we should know because we gave them to him. But the question is whether or not he still had them at the time? I dont know any better than you or anyone else on yahoo answers.....I wasnt a UN inspector and wasnt there.

2007-03-08 13:20:28 · answer #4 · answered by zebj25 6 · 1 0

The source was always the CIA and they openly admitted to the information being inaccurate. I won't be trusting any CIA information because they are too well known for their mistakes in the past and it seems they still have that same behavior they just made it more politically correct and separate their self from their agency when they want to bypass the rules our country set for them.

2007-03-08 13:38:47 · answer #5 · answered by George G 3 · 1 0

Those WMD were moved from Irak to Iran.
Iran is trying to send them to Syria if attacked by the US,
Syria has started talks with the Soudanese regime to host those WMD in case of trubble.

2007-03-08 13:33:34 · answer #6 · answered by Nyaru 2 · 0 1

Of course not! There never were any legitimate sources of such tales. It was made up by Bush and Co. despite the fact that Bush-appointed EXPERTS said no, no, a thousand times no!

2007-03-08 14:46:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, the released them when presenting the case.

2007-03-08 13:18:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes, The Onion.

2007-03-08 13:18:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes. There were piles of intel and transaction receipts dating back into the eighties and beyond

2007-03-08 13:20:08 · answer #10 · answered by sjsosullivan 5 · 2 0

Yes. Iranian Iraqi war. Slaughter of the Kurds.

Is this enough for your or doesn't it matter because it was in the past?

2007-03-08 13:18:32 · answer #11 · answered by SGT 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers