Then the OP could be in his own western.
"A Fistful of Testicles".
2007-03-08 05:20:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Zapatta McFrench 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
don't sleep with a man who doesn't have enough guts to be a father then you won't have to chop any nuts off even if that means just paying child support.
if a personhaving a baby and she doesn't know who the father is then maybe a person shouldn't spead their legs so often. don't punish a baby because neither men or women seem to be able to keep their pants on these days.
2007-03-08 06:27:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Chrysanthi W 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
It dawned on me last night that abortions should become illegal! Here is the kicker! It takes two to tango. So many anti choicers say well if one didn't spread their legs the wouldn't find themselves in the situation. That's has a sense of truthfulness too. Just like if the guy didn't drop his draws. It takes too to tango. The woman must have the child. Period. The man must support the child. Any many who a father must provide for the child. Failure to do so should result in immediate castrations. This will prevent welfare from exploding when abortions became illegal.
2007-03-08 05:22:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by wondermom 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
When you say walk away, does that include financial obligation as well? A man can be court ordered to support the raising of his child , yet never allowed to be an influence.
Also, men don't just get women pregnant, the female does have some input there, wouldn't you agree? I mean come on, if a woman doesn't want to have sex , she's not getting pregnant.
2007-03-08 05:20:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Wow...crossing my legs before I answer this question. It is definitely easy for men to walk away. Leaves you wondering where the pride and integrity are in this type of person. Just another sad commentary on our society that some are just not willing to live up to their responsibilities in life. What about men who don't pay child support, what should we chop off for that slight? :)
2007-03-08 05:51:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bryan 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I'll have to look for the question, but...
While men can walk away from a pregnancy (leaving the woman to decide what to do), men don't have the right to walk from the child born out of a pregnancy and have the responsibility to care for the child for 18 years!
2007-03-08 05:13:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
I don't quite see the same moral equivalence, but perhaps in support of your position nevertheless...
Chopping a guy's nuts off is the moral equivalent of forcing a woman to carry a pregnancy to term not of her own choosing.
Or of forcing her to be sterilized. Or of forcing her to have an abortion. Or of imposing ritual genital mutilation.
Either way it's about somebody else imposing a medical decision on you without your consent.
2007-03-08 05:17:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mark P 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Actually, a better solution would be for both the woman and man to stop and think before it's even an issue. Prevention makes more sense. Then again, some guys deserve to have them lopped off.
2007-03-08 05:16:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Hemingway 4
·
4⤊
1⤋
How is it any different then a female who can not support a child. It's her choice to get an abortion even if the guy wants to keep the child.
If the female wants to keep the child but the father doesn't, isn't this a way of "aborting" the pregnancy for him?
2007-03-08 05:15:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by SGT 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
No no chopping nuts off and no making slaves of the unwanted babies.
Come on people :)
2007-03-08 05:14:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by kittenbrower 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
Irony - isn't that dressing it up just a bit too much?
It's a rhetorical non sequitur that isn't beneath you is what it is.
It may be time to give serious consideration to getting a life. Whataya think?
2007-03-08 05:17:59
·
answer #11
·
answered by Fast Eddie B 6
·
2⤊
2⤋