so...the ipod nano is only 8GB and can only hold 2,000 songs. and then the 30GB ipod video has 22 more GB and u can watch videos and things on them and they can hold 7,500 songs...but y r they the same price? that seems so weird to me...someone explain. thanks
2007-03-08 05:08:37 · 8 answers · asked by kcbooboo6789 2 in Consumer Electronics ➔ Music & Music Players
you're right! they're both $249...isn't that weird? well, if i were you i would get the 30GB...more storage and you can watch video on it
2007-03-08 05:55:59 · answer #1 · answered by Queen of the Rÿche 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The 8GB Nano is about the same price as the 30GB video, because it is about 1/5th the weight and less than 1/4 the size of the 30GB unit. The technology to make an 8GB unit this size is more expensive. Also, the 8GB has about 20 hours battery life compared to 8 hours with the video 30GB unit.
2007-03-08 13:18:32 · answer #2 · answered by nyninchdick 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The 30GB iPod also has a larger screen. Are you sure you've got the prices right? By the way, with a little modifying, an iPod Nano can play video. Still though, it's a small screen...
2007-03-08 13:16:30 · answer #3 · answered by Graham T 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They should not be the same price, although the nano might have a slight premium because it's smaller. Yeah, smaller electronics sometimes carry a premium.
Also, keep in mind that discontinued models may have cheaper prices just to get them our of inventories. The 30GB Video is discontinued.
2007-03-08 13:17:00 · answer #4 · answered by Jay 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
One is a lot smaller. if a small size is important to you, then you go with the Nano. That is what I did. who wants a iPod video while working out at the gym.
2007-03-08 13:26:03 · answer #5 · answered by Stuart G 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that sounds wrong but anyway get a erm ipod video i have a white one and it is fab nanos cannot play videos videos can
2007-03-08 13:16:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
nano only for music, video can be music and movie
2007-03-08 14:08:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
are you sure? the 30 GB had more storage
2007-03-08 13:12:54 · answer #8 · answered by Monet 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋