2007-03-08 04:56:17 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Of course. It is a well-known affirmative defense. (see Borden v. Goodyear, 1978 and Trojan v. Krazy Glue, Inc., 2001)
2007-03-08 05:07:28 · answer #1 · answered by SA Writer 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It probably won't be your best defense,analogy is always fun but not always the answer.Good luck in court and let us know how you made out in the end..
2007-03-08 13:14:21 · answer #2 · answered by Sidetracked0260 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. It takes BALZ for a pro se case, but I don't think that is a valid defense.
Remember what Lincoln said about representing oneself.
2007-03-08 13:00:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
You can try if you want to add another 5 for contempt of court.
2007-03-08 13:01:44 · answer #4 · answered by bigsey93bruschi54 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure if you don't mind a verdict like go directly to jail, do not collect $200
2007-03-08 13:05:44 · answer #5 · answered by He calls me cranky 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The synthetic heroin abuser Rush thinks its valid
2007-03-08 13:00:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Quite possibly the only defense.
2007-03-08 12:59:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Only if you're under age 10.
2007-03-08 18:52:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
anyone who acts as their own lawyer in court has a fool for a client
2007-03-08 13:00:57 · answer #9 · answered by kapute2 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, seeing as how everything the prosecution has to say would bounce off of you and stick to them, I don't see how you could lose.
2007-03-08 13:06:08 · answer #10 · answered by Bad Ichi 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋