English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Or would simple impeachment be OK???

Bush being the supream decider of the Moral High-ground. knew when he started down the torture path that it would be his eternal curse.

2007-03-08 04:25:21 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

People with high-morals don't allow torture. Guess he's not as "moralistic" as previously supposed.

2007-03-08 04:30:39 · answer #1 · answered by Groovy 6 · 2 4

Bush is simply leading a war. Under your logic, Abe Lincoln should have been killed for leading a war against the south.

And lastly, you can't impeach a President simply because you do not like him. If you have evidence he lied, I'd really love to hear it, becuase it's be the first time I've ever heard it. All I have seen is evidence about how he was wrong, none of which even suggests he lied. Otherwise, every other country with great evidence against Saddam would have 'lied' too.

2007-03-08 12:39:14 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Info 3 · 3 0

well, an impeachment would be nice, but the conservatives in this nation, including the evangelicals, or so-called christian ministers, have too much clout, and support bush, so that will not work! it looks like we, the people. who have been lied to, deceived, and duped by george bush, and dick cheney, donald rumsfeld and the entire republican congress, will have to lick our wounds for being so stupid!!! at election time! anyone who voted for bush in last election, and now whines, bellyches, and complains about the iraq war, loss of life, and the fact he does nothing for thepoor, and elderly, need to put the blame squarely on themselves! it is the fools and dunmmies in america whoare to blame, also!! not jsut one man, george bush! you have a good point! and are right! but sadly, people like you and me will never get heard!!

2007-03-08 12:35:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Given the political and social climate Bush has descended America into over the past 6 years either would be reasonable, though waterboarding at Gitmo would seem more appropriate.

2007-03-08 12:33:27 · answer #4 · answered by worldinspector 5 · 2 4

No, I believe simple impeachment will be enough. Unfortunately that probably will not happen because Pelosi said she has no time to waste on that crap but moving the country forward. Maybe we should just wait for the war crimes trial.

2007-03-08 12:34:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

So going by your childish logic then we should BEHEAD all terrorist and Arab civilians, because that is what they are doing...so...hummm...maybe you should go back to playing Play Station or do your 8th grade homework...

2007-03-08 12:46:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Absurd question. Again I will answer the impeachment question as - NO CRIME COMMITTED NO IMPEACHMENT! Please use a different bash - the impeachment thing is getting really old.

2007-03-08 12:36:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Silly

Silly

Silly

2007-03-08 12:29:13 · answer #8 · answered by pilotB 3 · 4 2

There are NO legal grounds for impeachment.

2007-03-08 12:29:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

actually, we are doing unto others as they have done to us.
next.

2007-03-08 12:40:12 · answer #10 · answered by slabsidebass 5 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers