Nope. If A=B, & B=C, that doesn't mean A=C. C could equal all the rest of the alphabet, (hypothetically) & that would mean that A did as well. Seems more an apples & oranges thing to me. Not as simple as it first might appear. Sort of like, since dogs have four legs, all animals with four legs are dogs. You think?
EDIT: peachyke introduced NUMBERS, & in this case, it makes sense. But some of the comparisons made just don't apply at all to the A-B-C thing.
2007-03-09 15:59:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Valac Gypsy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes, as if a=6, then b=6, because a=b. And if b=6, and b=c, then c=6, too. A=B=C!!
2007-03-08 16:12:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by peachykeen1617 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
But what if b were to rebel and become something that was not equal to a or c, but a and c were still equal? Would you still get it?
Maybe, maybe not, but besides would still be spelled incorrectly.
2007-03-08 14:35:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Unexpectedly George 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
as wells as c=s becides=besides ? haha get it? i did.
2007-03-08 14:18:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by 070907_NF 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. Because I=Me, Me=Myself, Myself=I. :P
2007-03-08 14:13:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes cos its like a loop
they're all the same number
2007-03-09 00:45:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes child, it's elementary algebra.
.
2007-03-09 05:44:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2007-03-08 13:43:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by watanake 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Apparently they are all the same number.
2007-03-08 12:33:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by sublime1973 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Apparantly c=s as well huh?
2007-03-08 12:27:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Captor of Sin 6
·
1⤊
0⤋