English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What would you do if

1) you found out God endorsed either Democrats or Republicans (whichever isn't your general view point)?

2) someone made a point for the opposition that was a perfect argument and no rebuttle possible?

3) Next Presidential election there was a 3rd party that supported your ideas fully but you doubted they had a chance in hell of winning?

4) Bush admits that he really did go into Iraq for the oil and he knew there was no WMDs?

5) Bush admits that there were WMDs but chose to keep it a secret to save the world?

2007-03-08 03:57:07 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

1. God doesn't endorse anyone despite what the evangelicals tell you.
2. One point does not mean anything. There would have to be many, many points so unrefutable for me to change. I am not a one issue person.
3. I look at ALL candidates. I have voted for 3rd party candidates to protest the idiots both major parties put up. 1980 I voted 3rd party.
4. He won't so I don't worry about it. If, by some miracle, he did than the war crimes trial begins January 21, 2009
5. See answer to number 4.

2007-03-08 04:06:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

1) God is above politics and won't endorse any politician. The Pope is his spokesman.

2) Congratulate them.

3) A third party will never win at any point in the near future due to the way the political system is set up. They way it works now is you examine the candidates and vote for the lesser of two evils. The only way to solve this is to abolish all political parties.

4) Won't happen because it's not true.

5) I would wonder why he would keep it a secret.

2007-03-08 04:13:49 · answer #2 · answered by The Man from Nowhere 3 · 1 1

1. God gave man a brain and free will...and wants us to us them. I would be interested in His reasonings for support...and it might influence me.

2. I would listen and respect. It may even change my mind.

3. Voting for a party that hasn't a hope in hell (if proven) is throwing away a vote.

4 & 5. I would have a newfound respect for him, if he admitted his wrongdoing or dishonesty. Just as I respect any of the politicians who are now admitting that they were wrong in their original support of the war. I am a great believer in the fact that we all make mistakes...but real strength comes from the recognition and admission of that...and learning from it.

2007-03-08 04:24:35 · answer #3 · answered by Super Ruper 6 · 1 1

god endorsing a party i do not like? well, i guess it proves i was wrong, huh? these questions are not only unrealistic, but foolish! people will always have different opinons as loing as we breathe! as far as bush, the worst president since nixon? if he admitted that he really went into iraq for oil, it would shock the entire world! him!! admitting he does anything wrong will not happen! on his watch! you make some good points, though!

2007-03-08 04:04:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

1) to be honest, i'd question whether god knew what he was talking about.

2) if it is a perfect point then they'd probably convince me of their point.

3) depends on the other candidates. if my other two choices were an ok candidate and one i really dislike AND if it was a close race between the two i'd vote for the ok one. if it looked like the ok candidate was going to win, i'd vote for the 3rd party candidate.

4) i'd start to support impeachment proceedings.

5) i wouldn't believe him.

those are my honest answers.

2007-03-08 04:09:36 · answer #5 · answered by Mr. O 3 · 1 1

God is not choosing between Democrats and Republicans. The other points are up for a point by point decision.

2007-03-08 04:03:40 · answer #6 · answered by ElOsoBravo 6 · 1 1

I don't believe anyone agrees entirely with either one. I'm republican but I don't agree with EVERYTHING said. Like the insurance program suggested by Bush, for me I think it's a joke.

2007-03-08 04:03:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

properly there are unfavorable events yet not for benefit yet for money. the eco-friendly social gathering in some states and the libertarian social gathering in others. those are purely like the community shops attempting to combat with wal-mart.

2016-10-17 21:15:33 · answer #8 · answered by ramayo 4 · 0 0

Silly

2007-03-08 04:01:44 · answer #9 · answered by pilotB 3 · 2 2

1-won't happen
2-give them a pat on the back
3- vote for them anyway
4-won't happen
5-how would this save the world?

2007-03-08 04:02:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers