English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

Wouldn't that be a great choice to have?

I want to say Manning because QBs are more valuable when the game is on the line...can't use an RB with limited time on the clock.

That said, I'd still go with LT. He's just such a unique talent and dominant player that I couldn't pass him up. Pairing him up with a serviceable QB is the way to go.

2007-03-08 03:49:52 · answer #1 · answered by Terry 2 · 1 1

Manning. For many reasons. He knows the game, Works hard, stays out of trouble with the law, and would be the best leader.


To every idiot that said LT. The most overrated player in the NFL. If he didn't have the chargers O-line he would be nothing. With good blocking like that anybody could run that good.

Casey: LT needs talent around him. Every player does. LT would win if the other 10 guys stepped off the field?????? I don't think so. You're the idiot talking nonsense. Just shut-up.

2007-03-08 05:07:27 · answer #2 · answered by amLS3 1 · 0 0

The only person on that list worth anything is LT. Manning is awful when he's under pressure. If more teams would realize that, we would say, Peyton who? Tom Brady has massive talent around him and one of the best coaches in the NFL calling the shots. LT is simply phenomenal. From junior high til now nothing but broken records. Real nice guy too.

2007-03-08 03:49:44 · answer #3 · answered by Juggalo Happy 2 · 1 0

P. Manning can only do "miricles" if he has recievers, so not him. LT, great back, good all-around player....buuut, i don't think he is the "leadership" position filler. T. Brady can work with b- or less recievers, sorta run the ball, and he is a great team leader. I would start off with Tom Brady

2007-03-08 07:35:59 · answer #4 · answered by Kasey B 4 · 0 0

Tom Brady, Why because hes a clutch player and he doesnt need a great recieving squad. LT is a 1 hit wonder and wont be great this year like last year. and Peyton is overrated. Harrison and Wayne plus one great line. Brady fo sho but i rather have Brees because he a Saint

2007-03-08 04:20:13 · answer #5 · answered by Preston S 2 · 0 0

LT...this guy cannot only run the ball in superb fashion, but he has great hands to catch balls out in the back field....lets not forget to mention he has passing skills as well and might someday break the most touchdown passes thrown by a non-quarterback.

respond to "Incline"
tomlinson was drafted and started his career in 2001...back then the san diego chargers were a dysfunctional team...they had quarterback issues, did not have antonio gates, and the offensive line was just that, downright offensive...other teams focused primarily on tomlinson as he was the only player worth covering and yet somehow,someway LT was still able to rush for ridiculous amount of yardage and plenty of touchdowns...

2007-03-08 03:54:41 · answer #6 · answered by hotstuff 3 · 1 1

Peyton Manning

2007-03-08 03:51:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

LT, he doesn't need talent around him to succeed, the other two do. There are 50 players I would select before Tom Brady.

Incline: Above average at best?
An above average player doesn't catch 100 reception his rookie year as a running back. Don't open your mouth if you are going to talk non-sense.

2007-03-08 03:46:37 · answer #8 · answered by Casey 2 · 0 0

Manning

2007-03-08 03:42:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Peyton Manning. He not only plays well, but he knows the game better than most coaches do. He can make all the throws, but can control the game as well.


------
EDIT:
------

"Casey",

What about the very good Chargers O-line?

If LT had the O-line of the Cardinals, do you really think he'd be as good as he is on the Chargers? I think if LT was a Cardinal, he'd be an above-average player at best.

2007-03-08 03:46:54 · answer #10 · answered by -Incline- 4 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers