When they said "what do you do with all those radiations and nuclear wastes?"
How is pro going to react to this?
Besides saying all you have to do is becareful and use it properly, can you support it with logical explanations?
2007-03-08 03:26:32 · 5 answers · asked by Reaper 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What else are we supposed to use? Environmentalists complain about coal because of it's impact on global warming. Others say no to Oil because it will eventually run out and using it causes us to do business with less than desirable nations. Can't burn trees, because there would be none left after about a year. So then what do we use for power?
2007-03-08 03:31:13 · answer #1 · answered by tobcol 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You have a choice.
Use fossile fuels,coal/oil.
Use hydroelectric.
Use Nuclear.
Or go without electric period.
Each has drawbacks and benefits.
Wind power is unreliable and even Ted Kennedy doesn't want to see a bunch of windmills.
Hydroelectric is my choice, the same dam can produce power and control floods.
2007-03-08 03:51:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
France is nearly 100% run on nuclear power and they don't seem to have any problems.
Nuclear power is safe and clean.
2007-03-08 03:29:06 · answer #3 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Nuclear energy is clean...
ALOT cleaner than coal power plants...
2007-03-08 03:31:23 · answer #4 · answered by Gottlos 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Waste can be safely stored for 10,000 years. What's wrong with that? I think between now and 10,000 years from now new storage techniques will be developed.
2007-03-08 03:30:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋