I'd like to see them do each other in in one fell swoop. But then again, there would be others to replace them. They're like cockroaches. As soon as you crush one, more start coming out of the woodwork.
2007-03-08 02:48:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by tangerine 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gerry Adams because he is the younger man.
Those of us on the outside who lack the knowledge of the reality of Northern Ireland can only hope that those at the centre have decided there has been enough tears, enough death, enough heart ache to last forever.
I just hope a country as fantastic as Ireland can find a way to allow its people to express the positive side of all it has to offer.
One state, two state or part of the UK no more killing, knee capping, etc would be something the we could all celebrate
2007-03-13 04:44:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by noeusuperstate 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gerry Adams is half Ian Paisley,s age that might give him the upper hand but but Ian Paisleys voice would turn you to stone and shatter you into a million pieces.
2007-03-08 02:55:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by bigjamsie 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Paisley- because I met him once and he's a very big man even though he's getting on. And I suspect he has a mighty set of brass clangers. Wee Gerry Adams is just a misplaced garden gnome or leprechaun ornament.
Paisley would pick the scruffy little bugger up and throw him out the ring by his beard.
Oh and to all those IRA apologists- they're all simply drug thugs fighting for heroin turf, you dosy gits- they don't give a toss about Independence- THE IRA FIGHT FOR DRUGT TURF TO FUND THEIR TERRORIST ACTIVITIES- join the army and see for yourself you load of limp-wristed Fennians.
Feck Blair- the IRA is just as much a terrorist threat as Al Qaeda.
2007-03-14 23:24:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No doubt Paisley's a fighter, where as Adams is a talker so he wouldn't last one round. after all he is the spokesman for sinn fein, he always maintained he's never had an active roll with the IRA. So that say's it all.
2007-03-14 21:38:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gerry Adams would wipe the floor with Ian Paisley
Whereas I would not wipe my SHITHOLE with Ian Paisley
2007-03-11 12:25:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by stephen261254 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Uncle Gerry would paint the street with "Dr" Ian. If he doesn't, i'm sure there a 9 mm in his trouser pocket to finish the job off. He wouldn't need to, "Dr" Ians alzheimher's will be better fun.
2007-03-10 01:48:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by JamesyM 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
the only reason that gerry adams went to the speaking table replaced into because of the fact interior the aftermath of 9/11 all money from the u . s . a . dried up and sinn fein ought to no longer arise with the money for to purchase the bombs and bullets to kill, homicide and significant harmless people
2016-11-23 15:15:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
ian dosent like physical conflict, he threatens, blusters, blood and thunder statements mingle with pious prayers from his lips towards a , D.U.P. heaven somewhere in another world where no catholic may enter. the DUPES who listened to him/ some to their eternal regret have gone to his heaven. ian , for all his professed loyalty would not serve in his majestys armed forces, so the contest between ian and gerry would be null and void, but you never know a (FIX) could be managed somewhere along the way, mutual to both,(BOXERS) initiated by bertie and tony.
2007-03-15 00:42:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gerry Adams would win any physical contest but the violence would serve no purpose. Just more meaningless violence to add to the history of the struggle.
2007-03-14 16:29:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by seattleogre 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If they are Christians then they would not be able to fight each other. They would have to love each other, if they are not Christians then the winner would be Gerry you can tell hes the hard man of the two.
2007-03-11 08:43:45
·
answer #11
·
answered by chris h 3
·
0⤊
0⤋