Are You Convinced Yet That 9/11 Was an Inside Job?

Question

People keep sending me compelling evidence that 9/11 was an inside job. One of the first videos to suggest somethng was amiss was Michael Moore's Farenheit 9/11. Later on, someone sent me 9/11 Mysteries, which was a bit more compelling than Farenheit 9/11. Today I watched Loose Change, which is the most compelling argument that 9/11 was an inside job that I have yet seen. Compared to those who argue that 9/11 was an inside job, the opposition argument is extraordinarily weak and suspiciously lacking in evidence. How long has it been since our government has told us the truth about anything?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=loose+change&hl=en

Some of those who have been quick to answer no and ridicule the thought, haven't had enough time to watch any of that video. Is ignorance the only way such people can maintain can maintain their illusions?

Answer 1

Oh yes....I was convinced long ago. The evidence is overwhelming. Those who try to debunk the theory....I say are brainwashed by the administration. Since Bush said "You can fool some of the people all the time, those are the ones we are concentrating on." And the 'official' people who say it was terrorists on planes.....I believe are bought and paid for by the government. Look up(especially on youtube) Operation Northwood.
And as for your last question....probably when they gave the Federal Reserve(and all the people's gold reserve) to private bankers. It's history....no disputing that!

Answer 2

The counter claims are only lacking in evidence if you ignore it. All the evidence says no, it was not an inside job.

Moore is a political hack. He is not a very good film maker so he has to be contentious. And he has a political agenda. 911 mysteries is a pack of unsupported rubbish and as for loose change, read this,

http://www.loosechangeguide.com/lcg2.html

a comprehensive debunking of all the so-called evidence of loose change. If you only read one side of course you will not see the evidence from the other. It is called balance. All those who have credentials do not agree with you. The 'scientists' who support the conspiracy have no background in the disciplines they talk about and in many case have absolutely no scientific training in any discipline.

Why do you say we are quick to do anything? We have been over this time and again. You who believe in a conspiracy keep on trotting out the same tired old lies. Nothing has changed and it won't because you have NO evidence.

Answer 3

That information I recieve isn't worth my time any more.

I suggest you look into the rebuttal sites as well.

Or how about this mind game.

The shear number of people need to pull off an operation the scale of 9/11 as claim by the consiparcy people.
The supplies and money and all the possible things that could have gone wrong. Not one creditable piece of information or witness has come forward that can verified.
Or all the demolation experts ( a very small group).
Not 1 has come forward with the smoking gun.
If they did the whole thing would colaspe and every media outlet would be set for life for the stories.

None of that happens.
DC can't keep 1 BJ unwraps how can something like this be done.

Just think about you smart and figure out yourself that these consiparcy people need to get a life and move on.

Answer 4

Yes there are some compelling arguments that 911 was an inside job. Of course they manipulate the data and misrepresent facts to support their conclusions (sort of like the justification for going to Iraq). The seriousness of the event makes the conspiracy theorists even more anxious to alarm the populace.

Answer 5

I love how people believe that their precious government is too holy to pull something like this off.

I believe it was an inside job wholeheartedly. I think that Osama did have a place in it, maybe even planned it, but I think he did it with Bush's help.

I'm pretty sick about the whole thing. I love that video. It's even better than Farenheit 9/11 (my other favorite).

Thanks for having a brain. They're pretty rare these days.

Answer 6

Hey, I know it happened, I ain't arguing how it happened. What I am going to argue is who caused it t happen. I think that the events that followed 9/11 really seemed to benefit Bush and gave him a perfect opening to go into Iraq. Coincindence? Perhaps, but methinks not.

Answer 7

Yes I am convinced 9/11 was not an inside job. It was departments lack of communication. The who cares attitude as long as we sell flight training, also nobody can get in contact with anyone at the top that will listen. There are conspiracy's regarding we never landed on the moon and that is not true we did land on the moon. Don't listen to that fat overpaid Moore he is selling books. Look at the problem at hand our brave troops are dieing in Iraq, what is the answer here?

Answer 8

I wouldn't put it past the Bush Administration to pull this off, I just think this would be the worst act imaginable . I really hope this isn't true! I would then rank Bush right up there with Hitler as the worst leader ever in history !!!

Answer 9

Yeah, well, I just got an email telling me I won a million pounds in the Microsoft sweepstakes in Britain.

The two theories are equally plausible.

Answer 10

I was convinced the day that it happened! Was I the only one who could see the obvious?

Are you coming to the protest in Washington D.C. next week??? I'll be there telling the world that 911 was a hoax!