Logical positivism?

Question

"It is not a sign of ignorance for the ruler to silent and listen"
"When a ruler is silent and listening it does not mean that ________."

Please feel free to fill in the blank.

Answer 1

he is ignorant

Answer 2

"Our two minds .... One is an act of the emotional
mind, the other of the rational mind. In a very real
sense we have two minds, one that thinks and one that
feels" (Daniel Goleman, Emotional Intelligence,
Bloomsbury Publishing, London, 1996, page 8). This
rational mind is also called the faculty of logic and
reason. However, logic has its own limitation:

In the 1930s, Austrian mathematician Godel proved a
theorem which became the "Godel theorem" in cognition
theory. It states that any formalized 'logical' system
in principle cannot be complete in itself. It means
that a statement can always be found that can be
neither disproved nor proved using the means of that
particular system. To discuss about such a statement,
one must go beyond that very logic system; otherwise
nothing but a vicious circle will result. Psychologist
say that any experience is contingent - it's opposite
is logically possible and hence should not be treated
as contradictory.

Answer 3

No. Atheism isn't a range of logical positivism or empiricism. there are a range of atheists who're no longer logical positivists or atheists. There are also atheists who're no longer positivists or empiricists. The options motivating those philosophies are, besides the undeniable fact that, significant in atheism as well, it truly is what i think you've been getting at. Empiricism is an umbrella time period that covers all philosophies of confirmation that say that the purely beliefs that are shown are those requiring empirical data. An empiricist rejects the idea of "faith" as a valid potential to expertise. besides the undeniable fact that, an empiricist might want to apply complexity as a chunk of knowledge confirming the life of God and for this reason no longer be an atheist. There is also atheists who trust that no longer all expertise calls for empirical confirmation (atheists who position self assurance in auras, to illustrate). Logical positivism is somewhat distinct, because it enables the inclusion of beliefs that can't be empirically shown. Logical positivism actually states that there are 2 varieties of expertise: Analytic and man made (I received't outline them the following, yet in case you opt for one both e mail me or search for for it on-line). A logical positivist might want to argue that God's life is an analytic truth. (Any argument termed an "ontological argument" tries to make the point that God's life is an analytical truth.) As an aspect note, logical positivism has customarily been rejected as a valid philosophy of confirmation. you received't see many human beings claiming to be logical positivists as we talk; the purely ones who do are those who've at present discovered about it and have not considered the arguments hostile to it. in my opinion, my atheism is inspired by Confirmational Holism (which replaced into more suitable as a reaction to the topics with logical positivism) and Bayesianism (it truly is a philosophy of confirmation that relies upon upon possibility).

Answer 4

Hi Kyala C,
He shall not judge by what his eyes see, or decide by what his ears hear ...
>>>>>>>
In other words : He isn't ignoring, that person....
On the contrary...
Thanks, for the question!;)

My regards!

Take care!

Answer 5

he is not a fool for even a fool seams wise when he keeps silent

Answer 6

"...for us this signals are signals of an ignorant person".

Answer 7

he is deaf

Answer 8

he isn't aware