is einsteen's theory of relativity correct?

Question

what is the difference between special theory of relativity and general theory of relativity?

Answer 1

of course you a fool.i am a iit student.just check wikipedia.

Answer 2

As we have discussed in an earlier section, the theoretical physicist Albert Einstein introduced his Special Theory of Relativity in 1905 and his General Theory of Relativity in 1915. The first showed that Newton's Three Laws of Motion were only approximately correct, breaking down when velocities approached that of light. The second showed that Newton's Law of Gravitation was also only approximately correct, breaking down when gravitation becames very strong.
Special Relativity
Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity is valid for systems that are not accelerating. Since from Newton's second law an acceleration implies a force, special relativity is valid only when no forces act. Thus, it cannot be used generally when there is a gravitational field present (as we shall see below in conjunction with the Principle of Equivalence, it can be used over a sufficiently localized region of spacetime).

We have already discussed some of the important implications of the Special Theory of Relativity. For example, the most famous is probably the relationship between mass and energy. Other striking consequences are associated with the dependence of space and time on velocity: at speeds near that of light, space itself becomes contracted in the direction of motion and the passage of time slows. Although these seem bizarre ideas (because our everyday experience typically does not include speeds near that of light), many experiments indicate that the Special Theory of Relativity is correct and our "common sense" (and Newton's laws) are incorrect near the speed of light.
General Relativity
The General Theory of Relativity was Einstein's stupendous effort to remove the restriction on Special Relativity that no accelerations (and therefore no forces) be present, so that he could apply his ideas to the gravitational force. It is a measure of the difficulty of the problem that it took even the great Einstein approximately 10 years to fully understand how to do this. Thus, the General Theory of Relativity is a new theory of gravitation proposed in place of Newtonian gravitation.
Tests of the Theory of General Relativity
General Relativity and Newton's gravitational theory make essentially identical predictions as long as the strength of the gravitational field is weak, which is our usual experience. However, there are several crucial predictions where the two theories diverge, and thus can be tested with careful experiments.

1. The orientation of Mercury's orbit is found to precess in space over time, as indicated in the adjacent figure (the magnitude of the effect is greatly exaggerated for purposes of illustration). This is commonly called the "precession of the perihelion", because it causes the position of the perihelion to move around the center of mass. Only part of this can be accounted for by perturbations in Newton's theory. There is an extra 43 seconds of arc per century in this precession that is predicted by the Theory of General Relativity and observed to occur (recall that a second of arc is 1/3600 of an angular degree). This effect is extremely small, but the measurements are very precise and can detect such small effects very well.

2. Einstein's theory predicts that the direction of light propagation should be changed in a gravitational field. Precise observations indicate that Einstein is right, both about the effect and its magnitude. We have already seen a spectacular consequence of the deflection of light in a gravitational field: gravitational lensing.

3. The General Theory of Relativity predicts that light coming from a strong gravitational field should have its wavelength shifted to larger values (a redshift). Once again, detailed observations indicate such a redshift, and that its magnitude is correctly given by Einstein's theory.

4. The electromagnetic field can have waves in it that carry energy and that we call light. Likewise, the gravitational field can have waves that carry energy and are called gravitational waves. These may be thought of as ripples in the curvature of spacetime that travel at the speed of light.

Just as accelerating charges can emit electromagnetic waves, accelerating masses can emit gravitational waves. However gravitational waves are difficult to detect because they are very weak and no conclusive evidence has yet been reported for their direct observation. They have been observed indirectly in the binary pulsar. Because the arrival time of pulses from the pulsar can be measured very precisely, it can be determined that the period of the binary system is gradually decreasing. It is found that the rate of period change (about 75 millionths of a second each year) is what would be expected for energy being lost to gravitational radiation, as predicted by the Theory of General Relativity.

The Modern Theory of Gravitation
Our best current theory of gravitation is the General Theory of Relativity. However, only if velocities are comparable to that of light, or gravitational fields are much larger than those encountered on the Earth, do the Relativity theory and Newton's theories differ in their predictions. Under most conditions Newton's three laws and his theory of gravitation are adequate. For a more comprehensive introduction to both Special and General Relativity, see the links at Relativity on the WWW and The Light Cone (An Illuminating Introduction to Relativity).

Answer 3

The word correct is a relative term. In absolute terms, it is most likely not correct. In relative terms, yes, it is considered to be basically quite accurate.

Answer 4

Every experiment run so far verifies it. General relativity includes acceleration and gravity while special relativity does not.

Answer 5

To the extent current human knowledge goes, it is verified and proven correct. I stress the point at the current levels of human know-how. But we can never say (like at one point of time chemical fertilizers, antibiotic were considered boon to the humankind but today with advancement in technology and detailed study has proven otherwise)
Till our intelligence and knowledge base expands beyond the current levels and proves it otherwise, LET US ACCEPT IT AS CORRECT (IN THE ABSENCE OF PROOF TO CONTRARY)

Answer 6

It became first reported by technique of Einstein, and it has to do with time dilation and contraction, to boot as length dilation and contraction, with recognize to relative velocities. i do not see how that verse from the Quran says something about relativity, and in reality it truly is amazingly non-express, very resembling maximum verses from each sacred textual content. i do not see what you attempt to coach yet you actually have failed.

Answer 7

he didn't do anything without a proper research so it must be correct

Answer 8

proved and verified to be correct

Answer 9

i have the same doubt.send me your address mine's [e-mail]

Answer 10

It has not been proven wrong!