English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

All medical reasoning says NO but Ive heard stranger things happen!!

2007-03-07 22:38:58 · answer #1 · answered by Oops! 6 · 0 0

It could be possible I saw a montel show once a woman got pregnant and the baby wasn't in the uterus it was just floating
she couldn't have a normal birth and the 8 months she was pregnant was painful but she had a healthy baby girl!

2007-03-08 06:24:37 · answer #2 · answered by captinfuzzy420 1 · 0 0

I'm not sure but i think no i think you need to have a uterus so the baby could grow in but i really don't know

2007-03-08 06:16:09 · answer #3 · answered by Laura 1 · 0 1

no you need a uterus to be pregnant.

2007-03-08 06:16:48 · answer #4 · answered by estkijedsco 4 · 0 0

No. She needs in vitro fertilization to fertilize her eggs and implant it to a surrogate mother to have a child with her genes.

2007-03-08 06:15:45 · answer #5 · answered by nichol 4 · 0 0

Depending on her anatomy she could possibly have an ectopic pregnancy, but it's unlikely and they are almost never viable.

2007-03-08 06:22:29 · answer #6 · answered by melis 3 · 0 0

no i wouldnt think so. then theres nowhere for the baby to grow for 9 months.

2007-03-08 06:14:47 · answer #7 · answered by Şơƥɦɨȩ'ȿ ♡Μυɱ˗Μυɱ♡ 5 · 1 0

unfortunately not.

That is so sad tho :(

2007-03-08 06:16:02 · answer #8 · answered by PeTiTe_Mummy 4 · 0 0

No

2007-03-08 06:16:53 · answer #9 · answered by ஐ♥Julian'sMommy♥ஐ 7 · 0 0

I doubt it.

2007-03-08 06:16:57 · answer #10 · answered by Dr Dee 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers