2007-03-07 21:42:51 · 10 answers · asked by indiananytime 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What exactly do you mean? I would not deny my faith if that is what you mean.
2007-03-07 21:48:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes i would compromise religion for the sake of humanity as were wouid be no religion if there are no human therefore it is worth compromising religion for the sake of humanity . It would for sure make the world a better place...
2007-03-09 11:06:43 · answer #2 · answered by Ace 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To me, a religion sans humanity is no religion. I shall not give up humanity for the sake of an inhuman religion.
2007-03-08 07:27:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Religions are (very) gradually losing their grip on enlightened societies. See Europe. Statistically I am told that the Brits are 50% agnostics or atheists. Eventually, I suspect reason will prevail over superstition and anthropocentric humanism will reign supreme. That is if the corporations will allow natural evolution.
2007-03-08 06:33:38 · answer #4 · answered by emiliosailez 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Any religion has to be for the sake of humanity only.
If one does not understand the meaning of religion, it is his fault.
2007-03-12 04:28:01 · answer #5 · answered by Vijay D 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Religion is for humans.So, firstly one should be a human-being then only religion comes.Religion is made by human beings to guide them to remain good not only in thinking but also in deeds,actions!!
2007-03-12 04:24:19 · answer #6 · answered by suryakant d 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, because religion is to sustain humanity and not the vice-versa.
2007-03-10 13:35:18 · answer #7 · answered by drpoet 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, but my religion does not tell me to kill non believers.
2007-03-08 05:59:50 · answer #8 · answered by kittenbrower 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope.
2007-03-11 13:34:44 · answer #9 · answered by EveretteDavid 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
religious humanism is all i blv in......
2007-03-08 07:00:15 · answer #10 · answered by utopia 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋