English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

melting point of steel is around 2500f 1600c ... building 7 was not hit by a plane.. the wtc 1-2 would have fallen towards the direction of impact. firefighters near the damage zone did not report any heat. Bushes brothers security firm had access to the buildings prior 9/11 and was in charge of security. Explosions were heard seconds prior to them falling. Other sky skrapers have burnt for 23 hours straight and not fallen. The empire state building was hit by a B-52 and still stands. Why did the government illegal rush to destroy evidence before an investigation could be started? Why do they say some one would have come forward when anyone who does is just called a conspiracy theorist?

2007-03-07 20:47:40 · 23 answers · asked by Ⓐ iinux2 2 in Politics & Government Government

Definition of Theory::::

# a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world; an organized system of accepted knowledge that applies in a variety of circumstances to explain a specific set of phenomena; "theories can incorporate facts and laws and tested hypotheses"; "true in fact and theory"


# hypothesis: a tentative theory about the natural world; a concept that is not yet verified but that if true would explain certain facts or phenomena; "a scientific hypothesis that survives experimental testing becomes a scientific theory"; "he proposed a fresh theory of alkalis that later was accepted in chemical practices"

2007-03-07 20:49:41 · update #1

23 answers

don't ever talk about that when you're in new york...just an advice.

2007-03-07 20:58:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

Actually it wasn't a B-52, it was a B-25 which is a 2 engine plance - see the official Web site of the Empire State Building)

Even if it WAS a B-52, the fuel capacity of a B-52 under 20,000 gallons while a 747 carries around 50,000 gallons.

However, I think the best evidence is this: If Bush&Co were so brilliant as to pull off the best conspiracy in history, then they could have faked a weapon in Iraq.

2007-03-08 06:12:21 · answer #2 · answered by JB 4 · 2 1

Yes. I stay well informed working only 16 hours a week. I get bored and watch pretty much anything. I have no doubt 9/11 was nothing like the media has reported. I always thought it was staged. I remember that morning, smoking a cig out front of my work place, thinking how it was impossible no fighter jets intercepted either airliner that hit the towers, and a third into our foremost military agency? I am not a U.S. born citizen though so I am perhaps of a different view. I was born in what was West Germany. An army brat.

2007-03-09 01:12:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

none of that means a thing. lets see...how hot does a plane worth of jet fuel burn in that type of situation. im guessing it getshot enough to affect the physical properties of steel. it doesn't have to melt...retard.

hmm...i it possible that the buildings that were damaged near by were hit by derbis...or MAYBE the unbelievable shaking that the crashing of the buildings would have caused in the ground would be enough to cause another building to break apart. its not like NY is hit by natural disasters everyday and i bet that most of them aren't very earthquake proof.

you know for a fact that the buildings would have fallen in that dircection huh...wow you must be some kinda building demolition expert huh... nah probably just dumb enough to believe what ever someone else tells ya. is it much more plausable that because of the unique structural design of those buildings (where a majority of the stuctural support is in the facade and not in the center of the building) the parts that would collaps first would be the inside where the FIRE was, and because the inside colapes before the ouside it would be directed straight down...god you're dumb

Because i wasn't at ground 0, as i assume your also weren't ...retard)i can't pinpoint exactly where this supposed explosion came from. but is it possible that maybe something just blew up, maybe jet fuel leaked down into the building gathering in a room and when the flames got there...boom...dummy, try think'n outside the box

i feel pity for dumb and closed minded thinkers like yourself. You think just because you can't wrap your tiny little mind around it or come up with an alternate possibility yourself (because of your stupidity and closed mindedness) that your conclusion is the most likely explanation. The government can't do ANYTHING right, especially keep a secret....you're such an idot

I really can't believe that you would believe that our government, who screws everything up and can't do anything efficiently, is actually EVIL enough to do that to its own people. The people in washington may be sleazy but they are not crazy and would never resort to mass murder...unlike religious zealots who consider that a way into heaven.

I have one question for ya, how did they get bin laden to take the rap for it?

I hope someone flies a plane into YOUR house...freak'n idiot.

2007-03-08 05:18:56 · answer #4 · answered by Mark B 2 · 5 2

ok choad first it was a mitchell B-25 that hit the empire state building in 1944 flying less than 200 mph in fog.also the construction of this building is differant than the towers.you are right about melting temps but steel looses its strenght at around 1250 deg f.the planes that hit the towers were large intercontinental airliners ful of fuel and hit at around 750+mph.now the force of the impact knocked much of the shoddidly applied fireproofing apllied when hte towers were built allowing the heat from the building contents and av gas to heat the steel to failieur.yes there were explosions.this was the steel collums and beams shattering.building 7 was hit by debris from tower #2 and burned intensly from the ruptured gas mains thus collapsing.bush's brother doesnt do security of this type he is in banking(silverado)the security of the compound was the responsibility of the ny/nj port authority who lost 19 officers that day.i happened to lose 343 brothers that day and it really hacksme off when you morons come out and spew this crap.check your facts before you start running off at the mouth.email me if you want a class on structure fires.

2007-03-08 05:18:41 · answer #5 · answered by glock509 6 · 6 2

"firefighters near the damage zone did not report any heat"
Names and date of interview?

"Explosions were heard seconds prior to them falling"
Names of witnesses reporting this and when interviewed?

"The empire state building was hit by a B-52 and still stands"
The structure of the Empire Building is significantly different from that of the world trade center.

You haven't presented enough information to offer a viable theory. You're just repeating the same talking points we've heard for 5 years.

2007-03-08 08:00:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

It was not an inside job.

This question has been carefully researched and considered by top engineers and scientists and demonstrated false.

The popular mechanics article linked below has a good explanation in simple enough language for the conspiricy theorists to understand- if they would open their mind to the possibility that it was actually what it appeared to be.

I knew people on one of the planes from boston. Where did they go?

Elvis and the space aliens may be able to find the answers you seek..

2007-03-08 05:23:34 · answer #7 · answered by castlekeepr 4 · 4 3

Again, I urge all of you conspiracy nuts to search Popular Mechanics magazine archives for the exhaustive debunking they did a few years back on all of these kook claims. Or do you not wish to be "bothered" with a careful, logical examination of the facts? I admit, its not as sexy as these outlandish theories, but it is the truth. Seek it out. And get a grip!!!

2007-03-08 06:00:53 · answer #8 · answered by greatlakesdude 4 · 3 2

Very few people could really believe that such 2 strong buildings could be totally collapsed to the ground just by such plane crashes at the middle part of the buildings. It is true that most of the people are not expert in building constructions but not so fool that they would believe anything is said.

Perhaps, one day, it would be revealed that the 9/11 was an inside job but by that time all oil of Iraq would be taken out, Iraq and Middle East would be shattered and today's 'heroes' would be playing violins in the grave. And the then US Government would proclaim a big 'SORRY' for this event long past in the history.

2007-03-08 05:26:20 · answer #9 · answered by The Falcon 2 · 4 6

You freakin moron!
Do you ever stop to wander how a hopeless US Govt would mange to:
1. keep such a secret
2. Convince Bin Laden to take the wrap and spend the rest of his days hiding in a cave
3. Find 19 Arabs willing to board planes and die
4. Bomb Bali, Madrid & London subsequently

I could go on but that would just be wasting my time. What never amazes me about these conspiracy theorists is how they blame the US Govt for all the world ill's yet think it is smart enough to pull off such an intricate plan

2007-03-08 05:37:18 · answer #10 · answered by sftyk 2 · 5 5

You raise some preety valid questions and Ive always believed that 9/11 was an inside job. There's far too many unanswered questions to ignore.

2007-03-08 07:04:21 · answer #11 · answered by Wanda 2 · 3 4

fedest.com, questions and answers