2007-03-07
20:00:24
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Aaron
2
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Books & Authors
I have read the story, and do understand it. And it is quite obvious that he did not intend that his solution be taken literally (He, among other things, is satirizing the fact that the deplorable conditions make it his erroneous proposal seem somewhat plausible; this was intended as a catalyst for change as people would realize how far things had fallen). I simply have to lead a half hour discussion tomorrow and any help would be appreciated. To give you an idea of the depth I am looking for, I will give you a sample question that I have come up with:
- Swift wrote this essay with a clear purpose and skill. However, it was not well received, and as a general rule his true intent was overlooked. Keeping this in mind, is the burden placed on the author to create a piece that clearly conveys his point, or is it on the reader to properly understand it. Considering your conclusions to this question, was Swift's essay a model piece of literature?
2007-03-07
20:25:14 ·
update #1
I have read the story and do understand it. And it is quite obvious that he did not intend that his solution be taken literally (He, among other things, is satirizing the fact that the deplorable conditions make it his erroneous proposal seem somewhat plausible; this was intended as a catalyst for change as people would realize how far things had fallen). I simply have to lead a half hour discussion tomorrow and any help would be appreciated. To give you an idea of the depth I am looking for, I will give you a question that I have come up with:
- Swift wrote this essay with a clear purpose and skill. However, it was not well received, and as a general rule his true intent was overlooked. Keeping this in mind, is the burden placed on the author to create a piece that clearly conveys his point, or is it on the reader to properly understand it. Considering your conclusions to this question, was Swift's essay a model piece of literature? I'm looking for open ended, time consuming question.
2007-03-07
20:30:39 ·
update #2
if anybody is wandering why I posted that twice, I thought it would be replacing the original, not adding it to the end.
2007-03-07
20:31:52 ·
update #3