2007-03-07 19:55:17 · 3 answers · asked by teo q 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Not sure specifically about Australia but precedent is supported by further precedent. Judges who step out and go against precedent aren't liked by other judges and officials. Judges who continue to break precedent may not get far in the judicial ladder.
Kinda a vicious circle to maintain something that may or may not be total BS.
2007-03-07 20:09:53 · answer #1 · answered by Celebrate Life 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Judges are usually rigidly bound by precedents unless they overturn these by new doctrines.
2007-03-07 19:59:48 · answer #2 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Australia's court system is known for not allowing judges very much leeway on their rulings. There are strict guidelines they must follow. I know it seems rigid but there are good aspects of that type of system... it keeps things fair and equal for all ppl and doesn't permit some rogue judge from picking someone to 'make an example out of'.
2007-03-08 08:27:50 · answer #3 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋