Hence no funding for body armor, bullet proof vehicles, etc etc?
2007-03-07 16:50:01 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
How is not approving funding for more troops in Iraq going to help the ones already there. Democrats have to be idiots.
2007-03-07 16:58:36 · update #1
It's just as safe to say Democrats are good for nothing .
Actually, what are they good for- except running people's lives and raising taxes and running down America ?
2007-03-07 16:53:10 · answer #1 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 1⤊ 9⤋
Idiots. The Dem's are not funding the new troops that the president wants to send into to Iraq. It has nothing to do with current troops. Why aren't you asking about how this Republican president and his Republican congress let down the solderers who were wounded in HIS war and were not properly cared for?
2007-03-08 01:02:22 · answer #2 · answered by Killer Klingon 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋
That is stretching things but You could say the encouragement the democrats are giving our enemies causes more deaths. The biggest reason we are losing so many is our kindness to the people of Iraq. If the radicals occupied this country they would punish the population if anyone was hurt. Instead of being good guys we need to lock up the leaders that encourage attacks on us. That Al Sadr guy should have been locked up a long time ago.
2007-03-08 00:58:43 · answer #3 · answered by mr conservative 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
NOT YET the soliders are getting all the funding the president wanted. What the dems have done is tell the insurgents - to keep up the killing the US troops will leave soon. Under that concept - yep we will see more US troops in body bags.
2007-03-08 01:42:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
All casualties of this war -- past and future, killed, wounded, damaged, US, Iraqi, British, and the rest -- have the Bush administration to thank.
That's what got them there.
Um, all of a sudden you're concerned they don't have body armor, bullet-proof vehicles, etc.?
Where were you all these years when Bush Co failed to supply all these things?
THAT was OK with you?
2007-03-08 01:11:44 · answer #5 · answered by tehabwa 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Your promoting spam and are the problem here, I would get your facts straight before posting any more incorrect questions with some sources to back your claims. All this question is, is hate speech really. Not very intelligent at all.
2007-03-08 03:28:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Soldiers are dying in Iraq because of terrorists and the weak willed Iraqi people.
2007-03-08 01:00:12 · answer #7 · answered by rkmy78 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋
You moron, they want to cut funding for more troops not the ones in action now. I think it is nice that the Congress is representing the people`s will for a change.
2007-03-08 00:55:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
You can say any damn thing you want....but that don't make what you say true...And when your talking about neo/cons...nothing they say is true...So to all my liberal brothers....Ignore these ignorant @$$#oles.And let's focus on the important things...Getting out of Iraq ASAP....getting rid of the ignorant neo/cons in office...and ignoring these pieces of **** neo/'con postings
2007-03-08 01:24:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
The Democrat controlled congress will not only kill those soldiers, but kill us all in a matter of time.
2007-03-08 01:01:44 · answer #10 · answered by Michael Q 1 · 0⤊ 6⤋