English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-07 15:49:40 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

14 answers

****-Sapien Extinction

No, seriously. We aren't getting any smarter, or wiser, or more peaceful as a species. We are, however, getting better at death.

2007-03-07 16:00:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

The only true solution with HUMANS is make sure there are not many, and they are spread out so there are not many conflicts. The closest thing to war would be small nations fighting, which would be nothing compared to today. Sadly, the only way to reduce the population like that is by people dying. The quiickest way, well...war. And terrorism. Sadly, that's pretty much it.

Humanity as a whole will never be able to reach some spiritual level. We are, by nature, violent creatures. We (especially males) have violent tendancies. It isn't something we choose, it is programmed into us from the moment the sperm meets the egg. Society is the only reason we aren't MORE violent.

Sad, isn't it?

2007-03-08 00:05:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

"If you want peace, prepare for war". -Publius Flavius Vegetius Renatus, 390 AD

War is the solution, there is evil in the world, it must be dealt with.

evil prospers when good men do nothing- Einstein


Liberals fail at national defense because they ignore the presence of evil in the world. They avoid the issue because to acknowledge evil, you must make a character judgement, you must judge what is right, and what is evil in the world. Then you must choose a side, and choose to fight what is evil, and support what is right. Instead they espouse moral equivalency, "who are we to judge the Terrorists?", "they are people too, only poor or not hugged enough", "If only we can have a mutual dialogue with the Terrorists, then we can come to a mutually beneficial compromise" perhaps thats why they hate using the "T" word, it forces them to acknowledge evil, and along with the acknowledgement, the moral imperative to stand against it. They cannot stomach that. They believe all men are inherently good, therefore there is no need for character judgements. They would show partiality to the throat cutting misogynists, and take a stand against the troops, or the president, who protect them from the throatcutters. It is suicidal.

like Orwell said,
"Pacifism is Pro-Fascism"

today, he would say,
"Pacifism is Pro-Islamo Fascism"

2007-03-07 23:53:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Right now you cannot cry on split milk.They should think about the future if they think they cannot win they must leave at once so that further losses are not incurred never mind the consequences wipe the slate clean and start afresh.

2007-03-08 00:09:44 · answer #4 · answered by Dr.O 5 · 0 0

Winning

2007-03-07 23:52:17 · answer #5 · answered by Jayson Kane 7 · 4 2

a war is like a small fight you get into when you socialize with other people , so if you get into a fight or war fight to win do what ever is necessary to win , no fight nor war is ever won thru P,C, when will our great leaders learn this,

2007-03-08 00:19:03 · answer #6 · answered by james w 3 · 1 0

A spiritual evolution by every man, woman and child on the face of this planet so that instead of wanting to profit off of each other all of the time, we would actually care about each other.

2007-03-07 23:56:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Peace.

2007-03-07 23:58:01 · answer #8 · answered by Depoetic 6 · 2 2

Winning.

"In war, there is no substitute for winning" Douglas MacArthur.

2007-03-07 23:56:27 · answer #9 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3 3

In a nutshell, everyone being dead.

2007-03-07 23:52:05 · answer #10 · answered by Nicholas P 3 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers