2007-03-07 14:51:12 · 6 answers · asked by stitchedrockstar 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
if they arent they should
2007-03-07 14:53:24 · answer #1 · answered by king1515us 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dillon isn't the answer for the Packers too old, he's a better fit for someone like Philly who needs a big running back to go with Westy. Besides Dillon wants to go to a team that can win.
Rhodes would work, but i think they should draft one not get someones used goods if you know what i mean
2007-03-07 22:56:33 · answer #2 · answered by paulfenderply57 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would they? Rhodes is more comfortable as a change of pace back not a starter. Dillion much past his prime. Also, he is not very versatile which is a must have in this offense. We need a RB who can catch out of the back field, and Dillon cant do that.
2007-03-08 01:59:12 · answer #3 · answered by PackLover 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My goodness, I hope so. We've gotten rid of everyone and brought in no one. Ted Thompson has no idea what he's doing. You cant rebuild through the draft AND send Brett out a winner. I'd love to see them sign Corey Dillon or Jamal Lewis. I really wanted Travis Henry but its too late for that now isnt it?
2007-03-07 23:51:08 · answer #4 · answered by packerswes4 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no way, those guys are weak. this year they have adrian peterson and marshawn lynch in the draft and since the browns and texans have signed new RBs, GB can trade with Hou to grab peterson since it appears that the browns will draft quinn.
2007-03-07 23:47:46 · answer #5 · answered by what? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No because they will draft Marshawn Lynch in the Draft.
2007-03-07 23:03:02 · answer #6 · answered by $ACB$_LK 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋