Do you think the U.S. is ready to deal with a white female president or a balck male president? Personally I would vote for Obama because for one, I think it's about time we had an African American president. I mean he knows what people go through with poverty and racism. On the other hand Clinton is too pro everything, in war you can't be on both sides and I don't think her husband had such a great influence on the U.S.
What do u think?
2007-03-07 14:08:09 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Yes I see what you mean, most of what I said came for the opinnion of one of my teachers and I agree somewhat.
2007-03-07 14:49:37 · update #1
Althought I will finally be of age to vote in the coming presidential elections; my personal views on this are...
I think Obama would make a great president just not right now. He is still quite inexpiranced (with only 2 years on his back), His general ideas are great. I don't think that the idea "we need a half black man as Mr. P" will really have much of an effect.
When is comes to Clinton she follows too much of a socialist idea. And right now I don't think we need a women as president. She, in my opinion, is too liberal. What her husband did, did wonders for out country when it came to international relations, but you are also considering a women with no real military background too take over the 'world power' and because the Commander and Cheif of the Armed forces which currently is intrevening in the Middle East.
At this point in time I believe that both should wait until the next elections, and Obama really could use those extra 4 years. Althought both of their ideas are good, the real question is what they will end up doing as president...
we see now that the current president at the begning had a few good ideas but he didn't exactly follow through with them.
AND we can't really blame Bush for going into Iraq...when Clinton herself voted to intervene.
Personally at this point (still 1½ years aways) I am going for Former NYC mayor Guilliani; since I believe his main thought is quite independent, in some cases takes the liberal side and in others takes the conservative side. But of course there still is quite a bit of time.
2007-03-08 02:23:51 · answer #1 · answered by cilgin_can 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We are so fed up with Washington but we have had OUR heads stuck up OUR rearends for sooooo long we are too scared to speak up or speak out! Pay attention to Obama.....listen to HIM and not the media. To get back into OUR COUNTRY......WE/US need to turn off the tv most of the time. This country was founded on Freedom and Christianity which we are loosing at God Speed. Some people say "Go live somewhere ELSE and see how it is.!!! That's NOT the point...the point is is what our country was founded upon what made US GREAT! When you let ANYONE break laws they will break another and another. No One is above Gods laws but yet we have all these young men dying in Iraq over OIL, money and control.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVzQfa_V1jw&mode=related&search=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qHc8Nu2HPA&mode=related&search=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DoibU5njEM&mode=related&search=
2007-03-07 23:04:58 · answer #2 · answered by lester6801 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Obama is charming and would be a good candidate after spending more time in the Senate. I do not see him winning over the Republicans at this time.
Hillary is experienced, well known world wide and is pre-qualified to be President. If she does not perform in four years, give her the boot.
2007-03-07 22:48:17 · answer #3 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obama young senator with a lot of promise and here is a nice change he actually lives in the state for which he became the senator. Not like Clinton the moved to New York because there was an open senator spot. Then used her husbands fame to gain her own.
2007-03-07 22:16:06 · answer #4 · answered by kevh2589 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Lets examine the question......
1. B. Hussein Obama has a grand total of 1 year of experience at the federal level.
2. Obama not raised in the United States. Raised in the same radical islamic schools that the taliban leadership attended.
3. Admitted felon and user of cocaine and marijuana.
4. Using the "race" card when those of us who believe in equality know we are ALL members of the human race. Skin color should mean nothing. Knows nothing about poverty, raised in a very well to do family.
Clinton:
1. Also has a grand total of 1 year experience.
2. Her goals mirror the Communist/Socialist agenda.
3. Utilizing the "gender" card when gender and/or color should be irrelevent.
4. Also knows nothing about how the average person lives. makes $10,000.00 per month just renting her guest house to the Secret Service. Makes millions every year through other means as well.
So you have the choice between a crack head/radical islamofascist and a communist. Sounds fun.
2007-03-07 22:22:42 · answer #5 · answered by Bryan _ 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Rupert Murdock owns a great majority of the worlds propoganda news networks.... Fox included, He supports Hillary, SHE WILL BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT,,,
something funny is that in the movie Pluto Nash, she was on the money..... futuristic movie with Eddie Murphy.......
2007-03-07 22:17:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Barf Obama or Hillary Dillary Dyke? Thats easy-neither!!
2007-03-07 22:41:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
We are certainly ready for a woman or black president, but not either one of them.
2007-03-07 22:15:51 · answer #8 · answered by luna 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No neither are qualified. One is comunist, the other is muslim and would cause a civil war. If you are smart you will vote for neither.
2007-03-07 22:12:56 · answer #9 · answered by bildymooner 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
no, nor will we ever be, thank god..........................
2007-03-07 22:42:48 · answer #10 · answered by juanmeskin11 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋