2007-03-07 13:46:52 · 6 answers · asked by goring 6 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
Of all the theories each one has gaping holes that will be debated by many and may never produce a viable[generally accepted] explanation of the conditions that existed at time zero.
2007-03-08 03:31:21 · answer #1 · answered by Billy Butthead 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
M-theory is a cutting-edge theory of physics that deals with the extension of superstring theory. It is somewhat contentious in the physics community, as it lacks empirical evidence. If ever experimentally verified, M-theory and string theory would represent remarkable advances in science.
M-theory has been the target of increasing skepticism as some (notably Peter Woit and Lee Smolin) argue that string theorists have overstated many of the theory's strengths while underplaying its weaknesses
Unlike more conventional views of creation in modern physics, that are Ex nihilo, the M-Theory vision, although not yet complete, is of the whole observable universe being one of many extended 4 dimensional branes in an 12 dimensional spacetime. Although branes similar to that representing our universe can co-exist in the theory, their physical laws could differ from our own, as could their number of dimensions. Some proponents of the theory now believe that a collision of two branes may have been responsible for the Big Bang.
2007-03-07 22:51:22 · answer #2 · answered by Melanie T 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The 'Big Bang' is the most commonly accepted theory. This is where,13 billion years ago, a minutely small speck 'exploded', beginning everything that has ever been and ever will be. Prior to this there was no space, no time and no matter. As to the origin of 'the speck', I personally acknowledge the hand of the Heavenly Father. Of course you are free to draw your own conclusions as to origin of everything when there was literally nothing. Even today the universe is forever expanding.
2007-03-07 22:13:30 · answer #3 · answered by Joey 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The big bang theory is generally accepted, and it's observationally supported by the increase in red shift of galaxies as they get more distant. The other theories explaining the origin of the universe have much less evidence to support them.
2007-03-07 21:55:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
My theory which will be published very soon.
2007-03-07 21:56:35 · answer #5 · answered by TONY 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
god
2007-03-07 21:51:29 · answer #6 · answered by indian340 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋