Damn, this guy is next in line to the presidency? He's a nut, a power-sucking megalomaniac.
Watch out, because he's more than ready and willing to start another war with Iran. Just treat EVERYTHING he says with a grain of salt.
2007-03-07 13:35:31 · 9 answers · asked by mANN COULTER 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
... I agree.. and you can bet he was behind the Plame outing...I suspect no one crosses Cheney and gets away with it. I just hope they do not let up and do go after him and Rove. Wonder what they promised Scooter to take the fall for all of them... a big presidential pardon right?
...There will be appeal after appeal right up to the end of Bushies presidency and then Oops! a pardon. Another con criminal floats away.. i guess we should be used to it by now.
2007-03-07 13:48:32 · answer #1 · answered by Debra H 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That's one possibility. Check this site:
http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/7/13/04720/9340
The first story by Larry Johnson - a CIA "classmate" of Plame's is rather interesting and there is a reprint of
The White House’s Legal Katrina
by Victoria Toensing
Posted Oct 18, 2005
Which states...
There now appears to be consensus that no one violated the 1982 Agent Identities Protection Act in publishing the name of CIA employee Valerie Plame.
and many many comments.
Good arguments for both sides...
2007-03-07 14:39:28 · answer #2 · answered by seattleogre 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Bush/Cheney henchmen have been particularly bellicose in their bullying of government staffers from the CIA, DoD, and the Justice Department, gagged whistleblowers with false claims of "national security" to cover up, and gutting habius corpus, turning Guantanamo and other military bases into a gulags for torture and extra-judicial punishments. Then WaPo' Baker wonders if Libby can lie, maybe the Iraq War was based on lies??
While Clinton was impeachable for sexual inpropriety, a president who circumvented the Constitution he's sworn to protect is protected only by a shield called a "war time president" in a war that has no end. Doesn't the press see the implications for our way of life?
Are we content to have the Fourth Reich unfold in our midst out of concern about terrorism? Shame on us for our complacency, for our press corps intimidated to silence, for our lost democracy.
2007-03-07 13:38:49 · answer #3 · answered by dstr 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Uh, gee, since it was Richard Armitage over at State who leaked her name to Bob Novak in the first place, I'm wondering why you "people" are going on about Cheney and Libby in the first place. Any intelligent ideas on that one, Binky?
2007-03-07 13:45:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Take it with a grain of Halliburton. No-Bid contracts is all that this vice president can think about.....$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
2007-03-07 13:46:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I can hardly believe this question is being asked because it has been so plainly answered in the media already. Of course, he was behind it.
2007-03-07 13:42:14 · answer #6 · answered by teetzijo 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
OK man, I sure will, and thank you so much for this great advice. You are my new hero. I will be able to sleep now knowing this. So, thank you and good night.
2007-03-07 13:44:42 · answer #7 · answered by johN p. aka-Hey you. 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
There was NO conspiracy. There was NO "outing".
2007-03-07 16:13:32 · answer #8 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why yes, yes he was.
2007-03-07 13:38:20 · answer #9 · answered by Timothy M 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋