English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-07 13:25:16 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

10 answers

As the European leaders are vacillating, much as Neville Chamberlain did at Munich,and the U.S.A. is mired in Iraq, the Theocracy of Iran continues it nuclear weapons development. Israel being such a small state really cannot afford a nuclear strike and Iran has not retracted it's "wipe Israel off the map" ambitions. Thus the stage is set for Israel to go it alone. The timing of this depends on several factors; the advancement ot the Russian S.A.M. installations in Iran and of Iran's nuclear program. It will probably happen this year. If you pray, do so for the Israeli pilots and the innocents of Iran.

2007-03-07 13:44:01 · answer #1 · answered by Joey 1 · 0 0

we won't. bush has already screwed up enough . we have more terrorists because of his deciet on Iraq ,

already other countries like saudia ( an allie) will not sit back and let us do as we want.

already we are over stretched with our military and funds. to go into Iran would be a moronic thing to do. then again bush is president for now.


Published: September 24, 2006

WASHINGTON, Sept. 23 — A stark assessment of terrorism trends by American intelligence agencies has found that the American invasion and occupation of Iraq has helped spawn a new generation of Islamic radicalism and that the overall terrorist threat has grown since the Sept. 11 attacks.

The classified National Intelligence Estimate attributes a more direct role to the Iraq war in fueling radicalism than that presented either in recent White House documents or in a report released Wednesday by the House Intelligence Committee, according to several officials in Washington involved in preparing the assessment or who have read the final document.

The intelligence estimate, completed in April, is the first formal appraisal of global terrorism by United States intelligence agencies since the Iraq war began, and represents a consensus view of the 16 disparate spy services inside government. Titled “Trends in Global Terrorism: Implications for the United States,’’ it asserts that Islamic radicalism, rather than being in retreat, has metastasized and spread across the globe.

An opening section of the report, “Indicators of the Spread of the Global Jihadist Movement,” cites the Iraq war as a reason for the diffusion of jihad ideology.

The report “says that the Iraq war has made the overall terrorism problem worse,” said one American intelligence official.

we have enough of a mess to deal with .

2007-03-07 13:49:51 · answer #2 · answered by laughing_at_cons 2 · 1 0

Since when have we even begun to bomb Iran?

Haven't enough lives been lost already on a stupid war started by an idiotic, moronic, stupid president who was probably manipulated into starting the war by his vice president.

2007-03-07 13:51:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

As soon as we can. Lets see, maybe 10 years from now. Bush has lost all of his credibility, and Hilary thinks that would look real bad for us. We need to continue making the world like us, as we give our wealth to China. It is only right.

2007-03-07 13:34:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

You are fearing the lives of the Iranian people for no reason. It gives no sense to take away happiness at no cirucumstances with your stupid question. Be reasonable.

2007-03-07 15:54:43 · answer #5 · answered by nimesh 4 · 0 0

Your question assumes we ARE going to bomb Iran.

Although there's nothing too wrong or stupid or short-sighted for this administration, that doesn't mean they do every possible wrong, stupid, or short-sighted thing there is.

I hope the answer is "never."

Why do you want to commit mass-murder -- not getting enough of it in Iraq?

2007-03-07 13:56:23 · answer #6 · answered by tehabwa 7 · 0 1

The same day you sign up!

2007-03-07 13:49:39 · answer #7 · answered by shermynewstart 7 · 0 0

To be or not to be - that is the question!.

2007-03-07 13:30:24 · answer #8 · answered by supernova 4 · 1 0

since they harbor WMD and have threatened us- we need to nuke them now- if we dont, they'll attack us....

2007-03-07 13:53:16 · answer #9 · answered by OctopusGuy 1 · 1 2

not soon enough my friend

2007-03-07 13:33:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers