Rush Limbaugh is Bush's pet. He gets paid by Bush to spit out nonsense. Don't pay attention to him. Time to prosecute Rush too, you will see how many lies he has rolled up his sleeves.
2007-03-07 12:27:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by PROUD TO BE A LIBERAL TEEN! 4
·
0⤊
7⤋
Read the Washington post article on this subject from the day after he was convicted...I don't often agree with the post but in this case I think they nailed it...If I can be so good as to summarize it; they said the charges were spurious at best, the prosectutor was over zealous and that no charges should ever have been brought and finally (these are the posts words not mine), Joe Wilson is a blow hard...read it and weep buddy. i'm sure this will be the most complete and accurate answer, but something tells me I shouldn't hold my breath for my 10 points. You libs are really drinking the kool aid aren't you? it's like shooting fish in a barrel...lol
2007-03-07 20:31:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Steelhead 5
·
6⤊
0⤋
It's funny how people overlook Clintons perjury, but can't seem to let go of Libby's.
Hypocritical....
2007-03-08 07:46:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Q-burt 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
are you aware that the jury forman was working on a book about his experience on the jury? How much more is the book worth if guilty verdict? (about $500,000) It sure puts doubt on the verdict. Looks to me like grounds for a appeal to throw out the verdict.
2007-03-07 20:34:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by retired_afmil 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Oh, they are not defending Libby. They are trying to keep Cheney out of hot water,,you know him don't you??? He is the guy who had to tell Libby to blabber mouth on Plame. I can't hardly wait to see Bill OH, REALLY,,,, try to wiggle out of this one. The no spinner will be dizzy by the time the show is over. Bill, there is no proof that Cheney was involved,,guest, but Bill, are you telling me that, as his most trusted panyo, Cheney wouldn't know about any of this??? Bill, well, thats what I am saying here. It's all Balogna. Oh, I still have that beach front property in northern Alaska, with the palm trees, for sale to anyone who thinks Cheney is not guilty.
2007-03-07 20:35:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
Yes. If a Democrat was set up, you would be the first to notice. You know it was a political trap.
2007-03-07 20:29:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Matt 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because he committed no crime. Plame was not important to him so there was no reason for him to remember who told him she was CIA or when. She was not covert so revealing her identity broke no law. They are defending an innocent man.
2007-03-07 21:00:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Why do democrats defend Hillary and bill Clinton, do you have any idea how many people have died around and connected to them, Educate yourself, really see and open your eyes.
2007-03-07 20:26:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by sapphire 4
·
5⤊
1⤋
Because to be found guilty of perjury, one must have harmed the person they lied about, that is not the case, thus perjury charges should never have been brought against him.
2007-03-07 20:24:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by TE 5
·
5⤊
2⤋
Seriously man, I will PAY for the hooker for you. Whatever it takes to get you to ask QUESTIONS, instead of attempting to mask statements as such.
2007-03-07 20:26:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Tucson Hooligan 4
·
5⤊
1⤋
Because no conservative is guilty of anything and they should all be above the law because they are better than the rest of us. Any moves made by any conservative to suppress the fact that the Iraq debacle is a complete crock need to be honored and supported.
It is completely disgusting and as anti-American as you can get.
2007-03-07 20:29:30
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
7⤋