Do the Republicans need a president who apologizes for Ann Coulter or embraces her?

Question

All this humble hand wringing is making me ill.

Who is John Galt?

Answer 1

I hate watching the candipukes drool on their microphones trying to distance themselves from Ann Coulter.

If this is what we are going to get stuck with, 08' might really suck!

Answer 2

Neither. By apologizing for Ann Coulter you only validate her in some way. There are good things about her but she is just too much of a loose canon to to embrace. The Republicans would do well to leave her recognition with the talk shows and leave her out of actual politics.

Answer 3

The president needs 10 Ann Coulters!

Answer 4

i'm not fairly beneficial what the factor of your submit is. Are you certainly protecting Coulter's comments... because of the fact I beneficial do not hear you rebuking them. First, criticizing Coulter's use of the be conscious "f@ggot" isn't a suppression of loose speech; this is an workout of loose speech. i'm not advocating her arrest for using the be conscious. i'm purely asserting it became into stupid, pointless, and hateful. right this is her protection of the fact: "i did not use an insulting be conscious. I used a schoolyard be conscious, some married guy with babies — for the 8 billionth time, and the objective marketplace knew that. I recommend the shaggy dog tale does not have worked if I had inserted the call of a gay Democrat. the different Democrat, the call would have been inserted. it could have been Howard Dean or Hillary Clinton because of the fact this is a schoolyard taunt meaning wuss, meaning nerd, meaning weenie, meaning lame." rather, Ann? nicely i think of you're a c*nt. and that i don't recommend that for the period of an insulting way, I recommend it in a playful schoolyard way wherein I refer to a b*tch as a c*nt. you recognize what i'm speaking approximately, suited? So "f@ggot" ability weenie or nerd now. i will think of what would ensue if twentieth Century Fox launched "Revenge of the F@ggots" this summer season. And whilst Michael Richards called those African-American gents "n*ggers" he meant is as a nuisance or a complicated individual, suited? i think of it rather is super that conservatives can take a ethical severe floor because of the fact of their perspectives and then spew hate-slurs at liberals in a low-priced attempt to hurl schoolyard insults on the different factor. It rather shows the knowledgeable and open-minded human beings in this country what the appropriate wing certainly stands for... hatred and intolerance in the direction of every physique and anybody. base line: Coulter's fact became into indefensible. She had the appropriate to declare it, yet that would not make her suited for asserting it, and she or he merits each and every little bit of grievance she's getting.

Answer 5

Ann needs to taken with a grain of salt. She is a nobody. She is a nut case trying to find her way out of a paper bag. She means nothing to Prez Bush or anyone else on the hill. She is making a living degrading all dems and if Christ were a dem, she would accuse him of some awful thing. She has no class, zilch, nada, no no, none. As soon as the repubs are out of power, she will be history.Oh, yeah she does have the right to free speech, but as the consitution says, there is a limit to what you can call someone or falsely accuse them of.In this case, she went beyond free speech and if John wanted to, he could have her for slander. But, he's too smart and has turned it around to his advantage.

Answer 6

Apologize for what? It is no one's job to apologize for another person's speech, and it's not as if she is speaking on behalf of a political candidate. In fact I believe she should be celebrated for her outspoken nature in this politically correct hell we call the American media. Personally I share her conservative views and appreciate her sense of humor. Her words are twisted out of context by the wacko media. What she says isn't nearly as bad as the trash you can find on liberal blogs. She was primarily making fun of the Hollywood trend of "word rehab" when she backhandedly referred to John Edards as a fa ggot. Yet the media can feed zombies anything and they'll believe it. We should all recognize that the hysterical nature of the politically correct media blows everything out of proportion in order to boost ratings through sensationalism and further their own radical agenda.

Ann Coulter is an outspoken political commentator. That is separate from a political candidate. A candidate has the right to be neutral toward politically satirical comments. Thin skinned people can continue to vote for Hillary, Obama, or some other wimp like that.

Answer 7

Most Republicans would prefer a president who deals with more important issues that what a political pundit jokes about.

What about John Galt?

Answer 8

It is not the duty of the president to either condemn or accept her. She is entitled to her opinion, we are entitled to have an opinion about her opinion, and we do not have any duty to act based on her opinion, regardless of what it is. This includes the president.


Who is John Galt?

John Galt was the man who said he would stop the motor of the world... and did. ;)

Answer 9

LMFAO. Ann Coulter! Liberals should be singing her praises. Had it not been for her riduclous comments that liberals took so seriously, nobody would even be talking about poor John Edwards!

Answer 10

Not at all ..but men running for president don't need a hog as personal consultant , either - as did the two clowns short of a circus who ran for office did : Kerry & Edwards and their side-kick mascot-strategist , Michael Moore .