The terrorists believe America will pull out of Iraq without victory ....?

Question

Which political party is this view most compatible with?

I believe it is true that you are either cheering for America's troops to win or you are rooting for the other side.

The terrorists are on the public record saying so.

Answer 1

Democrats, of course. They will do anything including trying to de-fund the war (which would get our troops killed), embarrass the president and the country, and sell-out their own mothers to get a political victory! You want to make a terrorist happy, vote for Hillary in 2008! She might even have Bin Laden stay overnight in the Lincoln bedroom, (as long as he contributes to her campaign).

Answer 2

No, the terrorists don't have a militia, in line with se. The terrorists are prepared into remoted cells that have limited touch with different cells and easily hear to maximum command in a 17 November. (that's finished so as that, if one cellular is discovered, different cells is easily not compromised.) particularly there are cells interior of usa of america that are waiting for a command from that maximum authority. there's a super possibility that the leaders of a few of those terrorist agencies are in Iraq and unable to communicate to their cells with the aid of U.S. profession. If we pull out now, the terrorist leaders will use the destruction interior the country, in particular brought about by using Saddam Hussein, that has not yet been fastened by using the U.S., against the U.S. in lots the comparable way that Adolf Hitler blamed the Jews for all of Germany's problems. this would enable the terrorist leaders to recruit greater followers to rearrange into cells to go into usa of america. If some cells are helpful in getting primary interior the U.S., they're poised to attack the country in some way. An experience like September eleventh could be repeated. The U.S. suited now could be not allowing human beings to connect militant terrorist communities in Iraq. the shortcoming of the U.S.'s presence will probable reason problems for the two usa of america and Iraq.

Answer 3

Both parties. The Democrats and Republicans don't want US troops in Iraq. It's just a matter of timing. Democrats want sooner and Republicans want later.

My prediction is that Bush will get his troop "surge" and somewhere in the fall of 2007 to early 2008 we will see a decrease in the violence. Bush and Republican breathren who supported his "surge" will tell the American public, "I told you so" in attempt to secure Republican presidency.

Once the US troops leave Iraq, regardless of which Democrat or Republican timetable is use, Iran will gain more influence in Iraq until Iraq and Iran become "good" buddies. At this point, the conservative religious wing of Islam within the Shi'a muslims will take more control until Iraq's government starts to mirror that of Iran.

Answer 4

It depends on what do you mean my victory. One can say that we are vicotrious so far. I mean sadaam is dead, no weapons of mass distruction. But then again Iraq is being blown up everyday.

Which political party will go with that, the only ones are the terrorist them selves.

I do not think that our political parties are going for such thing. Not even the democrats. Yes most of them do say that the war was a mistake, but the can not diney the fact that we can not just get out of iraq. Then again, lets not forget what Bush is trying to get us into. He is talking about Iran which will only escalate the problem. He claims the Iran is dangrous, while his staff are shaking hands with north korea who have the atomic bomb. I just do not get how we can stand silent, but that is something else to talk about. Now, back to the middle east problem.

Their is something that is making our gov. get deeper in the iraqi problem. We can not just pull out. We can, but the gov has to stay there for something that they want. You can say oil. or just taking over the economy of the middle east. Kinda like a form of colonization of the 21th century.

I do not know.

But, America will not just pull out, although it is a wise choice, and it can save millions of lives, but, because they want something far more greater than getting rid of sadaam, or the terroists.

But, only time can tell.

Answer 5

Neither. Whoever posed the question has indulged in the most underhanded kind of sophistry.

Both the republicans and democrats understand that the terrorists believe that, and they are correct. If they did not believe that the insurgents would not be able to act.

That being said, members of both american parties disagree on what to do about it.

More to the point on this question, however, is the partisan wording. It reminds me of the McCarthy days, when he and Nixon spent all their time accusing the democrats (and other republicans like Eisenhower) of being soft on communism.

Realpolitik is not a field where true believers can practice that kind of inquisatorial attitude safely. To distort facts as a method of making political points leads to bad decisions and flawed policy, which Mr. Bush is proving to the satisfaction of history.

Shame on whoever came up with this one.

Answer 6

Democrat

Answer 7

I think that the Islamic extreemest are scared that we will win so maybe they are more like Republicans in that they understand that the United States can kick butt. The democrats however want us to loose more than the terrorists.

Answer 8

Bush has already accomplished what he wanted to in Iraq. To secure the oil for big American business profits.

If you're talking about fighting on the ground we will never be victorious

Answer 9

Yes shame on you for daring to ask a factual question that shows the Dem's for what they truely are...terrorist supporting scum whom will do anything..support anyone in their hatred of GW...

Answer 10

Did you ask them this, the terrorists?

How were you able to get in and ask them about Iraq?

Unless you know them on a personal basis...