Did you think it was convincing? Do you think it was Jesus' and his family tomb? Did you watch the debate afterwards? What did you think?
2007-03-07 11:27:15 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Anthropology
the show was a complete waste of time. it wasn't jesus' tomb. any christian should know that Jesus was ressurected and his body went with him. This director guy just want attention and hopefully nonchristians were smart enough not to watch it
2007-03-07 11:31:03 · answer #1 · answered by kotaboo32 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I only watch the debate and i think is possible is the tomb of Jesus as all the names are there! Jesus son of Joseph, Mariam , and the Judah son of Jesus , is really strange all these names together, so I keep an open mind, anything is possible! As far as I understand Jeshua was born , lived and was buried as a Jew! I in doubt as to the new testament writtings , because others are being found and are very different , the gospel of Thoas , the gospel of Mary Magdalene and the gospel of Judafh. so Iam thinking maybe the first churh fathers implemented into the new testament what was convenient for the churh, in this of course ,the catholic churh and its founder Constantine!I truly believe he was a prophet and was in a race to free his land from the Romans! I understand the new testament writtings were written many years afte the death of Jeshua. So in this century is all coming together you agree?
2007-03-07 13:13:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I did watch the two the documentary and the debate. i don't sense the documentary proved something. there continues to be way too many questions wanting solutions. i don't sense the 'action picture-maker/ journalist' did an extremely good job. yet he did do exactly what he meant to do.... each and every physique is conversing approximately it, no? I could desire to assert that i replaced into fairly upset with the debate in a while. Tom, i think of, did a terrible job at being purpose. Hubby and that i the two agreed the debate replaced into somewhat one-sided. i don't additionally be responsive to why Simcha replaced into even there. Tom nor the different 'colleagues' had any pastime in what Simcha had to assert. Tom stored slicing him off each and every risk he have been given.
2016-10-17 12:43:02 · answer #3 · answered by rosen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe in Jesus as my Savior and whether he physically ascended into heaven or not, doesn't change or influence my faith in any way. Same with Mary, from a practical standpoint I don't believe she was a "virgin" in the sense we think of it, and as before it makes no difference to me. These were extraordinary figures that influenced our entire world/history, gave us a whole new belief system, and are figures of importance to several religions.
This is an interesting subject though, and for people of very "cut and dry" beliefs, on either end of the spectrum, it will be a very heated debate.
2007-03-07 11:46:27 · answer #4 · answered by Kurius_Kitten 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I watched alot of it. I was tired, so I fell asleep. I am very interested in this topic. From what I seen it seemed really convincing. You bet this could be the find of any century. I believe from what I did see that this is Jesus and his family. Amen
Kotaboo you are an idiot. Have you ever seen anybody's BODY go with them? What a loser.
2007-03-07 11:31:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
People who claim that the ascension of Christ has no bearing on their Christian faith are morons and obviously have no clue what Christianity is. If there is one CENTRAL point to the new testament, it is the resurrection of Christ. It is pretty much the single most important event of the NT. Without the resurrection, the promise of eternal life in the NT is nullified. I seriously think that all proclaiming Christians should be required to complete a basic course in biblical studies/theology.
2007-03-07 12:17:51 · answer #6 · answered by seperationistsanxiety 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it was a good gimmick by the people looking for publicity and money for the bok and movie they will want to make! no! it was not convincing! i am a student of biblical history, and think the accounts that the apostles wrote down were sufficient! if jesus had a family, the nwhy do catholics still worship the virgin mary!
2007-03-07 11:31:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I didnot watch the show.
And so i cann't comment whether it was convincing not.... but i got a question.
Wasnt Christ crucified? What happened to his body? Did they leave it on the cross or get it down?
And i thought they found the body of Mary Magdalene...... somebody here is talking abt "Virgin Mary".
Am i Lost????
2007-03-07 20:38:48 · answer #8 · answered by DU 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If is funny the same people that do not even believe Jesus was an actual historical person believe that they found his bones.
2007-03-07 15:20:31 · answer #9 · answered by 6th Finger 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Was interesting but most if it was conjecture and statistical analysis, so hardly the basis of any fact. But never the less, interesting show.
2007-03-07 11:29:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋