WWE or TNA??? I say WWE as of right now. Right now it seems that TNA is just slipping. They had a head-to-head special against RAW and RAW got a 3.7 rating and TNA got a .07 rating. I think WWE is doing big things right now with Vince and Trump and Shawn Michaels and Undertaker and Stone Cold getting big pushes....
2007-03-07 10:58:07 · 7 answers · asked by Christopher B 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
wwe
2007-03-11 11:59:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yea definately wwe
they are way bigger and better then wwe and as u mentioned the ratings which clearly shows how tna is so behind wwe
and if u remember VKM skit that they did was just cuz tna was insecure
tna has a long way to go to be even considered as a potential competition...even in this wrestling page, 95% of the questions and answers are about wwe and rest for tna and other promotion
2007-03-07 11:15:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE is better because they have better wrestlers and can pay to take their superstars around the country for every event while TNA always has impact in the same arena, and films about 2 weeks of the show in one event.
2007-03-08 17:48:22 · answer #3 · answered by KISS Fan 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
TNA is better. TNA has the better action. you dont see ropes on top of the rings in the wwe, you dont see elevation X in the wwe. the only thing the wwe has that tna doesnt is the girls and the media.
2007-03-07 11:08:59 · answer #4 · answered by what? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
WWE
Kane
The Undertaker
Bobby Lashley
Sabu
2007-03-07 11:02:03 · answer #5 · answered by Davey Boy Smith #1 Fan- VACATION 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wwe.
2007-03-07 11:07:07 · answer #6 · answered by «G6260» 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ehh i cant really compare them right now,...they both seem really good!
2007-03-07 11:06:56 · answer #7 · answered by DιRTι DιVA 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋