Calling him "biased journalism", because he discusses facts no one else will, seems like an ad hominem attack to me.
2007-03-07 10:41:15 · 9 answers · asked by Longhaired Freaky Person 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
he's a commentator... he's not on the news... he's got a show... an opinion show...
it's his job to give his opinion... and since most opinions are somewhat bias... his show is bias... that's kind of the point of an opinion show...
saying he's bias is like saying the sky is blue... now if you want to talk about his opinions... then talk about them... show where he is wrong using facts
2007-03-07 10:49:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Lou Dobbs isn't a journalist. Therefore "biased journalism" doesn't apply to him. Why is it that NO ONE dares to disagree with him? Why does he think that immigration reform is the ONLY issue in the world to talk about? Why does he have "town meetings" and the only people who get to speak are from somewhere else and who all agree with him? You see my point...
2007-03-07 10:49:00 · answer #2 · answered by ginzawasabi 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
you recognize I even have observed that each and every Obama supporter can not take the undeniable fact approximately his or her candidate; it is not Lou Dobbs fault that the MSM is available and paid for. bill Ayres, Wright, Rezko, Acorn and all of the others are authentic and so are his socialist rules so very own as much as being techniques lifeless and not sorting out for your self. hey McCain additionally has known commies (Prisoner of war 5 years) yet it particularly is whilst he became into protecting your country not apologizing for it. Hero Vs Commie thats the alternative undeniable and easy
2016-12-18 07:59:07 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Exactly.I am very far to the Left of the man,but he speaks the truth like nobody else I've ever seen.
I think the problem with many of those who attack him is they really can't deny that he is on the side of the facts.
2007-03-07 11:06:32 · answer #4 · answered by Zapatta McFrench 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you bring up a good point.........the word biased is thrown around so much. To me, it seems that whenever someone disagrees with another person, they are automatically assumed to be biased. Instead of labeling him biased, that person should debate him.
2007-03-07 10:47:58 · answer #5 · answered by go 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The thousands workers laid off by GM, Ford & Hersey would
not call him biased.
Either would the homeless from Katrina - if they had a TV to
watch him on.
2007-03-07 10:47:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Usesa rackin mi brain dere liuaol one!
2007-03-07 10:44:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Sort of like the ones heaped on Rush ,,Huh.
2007-03-07 10:44:20 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Anyone can support there point of view with statistics, its all about how you spin it.
2007-03-07 10:52:23 · answer #9 · answered by asmith1022_2006 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋