2007-03-07 10:26:41 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No.
Especially when they say they "read the Bible while waiting for their Welfare Check".
2007-03-07 10:32:38 · answer #1 · answered by wolf 6 · 1⤊ 11⤋
Yes, a Conservative asserting moral high ground on y/a!
2007-03-07 10:48:30 · answer #2 · answered by Yahoo Con 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
i do no longer think of the two area holds ethical intense floor, nevertheless some people from the two aspects actually pick to think of they do. 2 aspects with 2 diverse techniques of finding at issues, and authentic now on a similar time as the massive (US government) has hit an iceberg, (deficit disaster) they are not in simple terms rearranging deck chairs, they're interior the saloon having a barroom brawl with one yet another, on a similar time as the deliver is sinking. it's time for them the two to strengthen up, and attach this. the two aspects are incorrect, and that they are appearing like sons and daughters who're having a stupid dispute.... they have had 30 years to close the hollow between spending too plenty and taxing too little, so their time is very almost up. with the purpose to respond to you, neither area has ethical intense floor, they're the two flat out incorrect, and could convey regret to one yet another for dropping 30 years in this one concern.
2016-11-23 14:07:00 · answer #3 · answered by llerena 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, Andy R quoting Jesus' opinion. None of us know His opinion & I hate to hear Him used in political opinions. He was extremely moral & the teachings were strict but loving. I do not think any political party can claim Him. I believe hHe would have been an Independent not a Pharisee.
2007-03-07 10:40:24 · answer #4 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
What I find ludicrous is the constant trolling that reduces political debate to the level of schoolyard taunting.
2007-03-07 23:52:14 · answer #5 · answered by Matthew H 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Thanks. I consider most liberal Q & A comic releif! I especially think it's funny how they are constantally pointing fingers without cleaning up their own mess, ie. Kennedy, Clinton, Gore, Kerry, Jeffers, Franks & KKK Byrd. Not to mention Democratic Leadership that has reduced our Congress to that of a kindergarten playground with all the back bitting and name calling. Well, I may have to amend that, most kindergarteners actually get along.
2007-03-07 10:40:24 · answer #6 · answered by rosi l 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Yes, a con asserting moral high ground on y/a.
2007-03-07 10:33:01 · answer #7 · answered by ck4829 7 · 7⤊ 4⤋
yes a con usin big words like "ludicrous" and "asserting"
2007-03-07 10:37:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
You can't judge morals based on the word liberal. I'm a liberal and I learned my values from the bible, so please don't judge liberals!
2007-03-07 10:37:53 · answer #9 · answered by healthyleeroy 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Your question makes more sense if you substitute the word liberal for Bush Neocon leadership.
2007-03-07 10:32:49 · answer #10 · answered by Raven 5 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Liberals are just as moral as Conservatives.. They just have different morals.
2007-03-07 10:34:22 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋