Would you recommend that all organizations employ client/server architectures? Why or why not?

Answer 1

NO not all organizations. If all you have is a couple of computers or 5 or even 10 peer to peer may work just as well. What makes the difference is WHAT do you need to DO.

If all you need to do is shared files then you really dont need a server just one computer on the network with a shared folder will do nicely. (I guess you could call that a server but its not really.) You might even get away with a NAS (network attached storage drive) Now if you need other services such as common fax, or large print jobs, or.... well it all depends.

If you have a lot of money to waste then sure get a server for each application you might want to run and then connect up to that server to do that application. (I think that is one which many consultants hope for, they need the setup money!) Even if you just have one user.. its a great plan to take your money. I think a read somewhere that was one of Microsofts best practices.. a server for each application.- they get to sell more server operating systems that way too. Of course if your organization is large enough then it might make good sense but only if it is needed. Not because some "salesman" tells you that. PS call me if you want to go the big route!!!!! :)

Answer 2

I say it just depends on the size of the network. No need setting up management servers for 5 computers.