English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is it Not?

2007-03-07 10:17:49 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

Junipero Suribachi, Oppostie of Magnify.

2007-03-07 10:30:31 · update #1

The Avatar, Both Are Correct.

2007-03-07 10:33:09 · update #2

wolf, There Are Salient Differences, Clinton Confessed to Lying, and was Punished, as Far as I Know, Libby Still Protests Innocence. Clinton Lied, but, In my Mind, the Question was Never Appropiate.

2007-03-08 09:16:39 · update #3

6 answers

It is. It is also interesting that GWB hasn't fired everyone involved in the Plame leak as he vowed he would.
Oh, that's right... he said he would "take care" of them, not "fire" them, my bad.

2007-03-07 10:30:40 · answer #1 · answered by Vernon 3 · 1 1

Minify? It is disturbing to see someone hauled in before a secret body-the Grand Jury- and cannot take a lawyer in for advice and then winds up a felon but is a person who has not comitted the crime they are investigating.

Sounds a little like a manufactured crime by a kangaroo court.Or what the English called the star chamber.

Although it is ironic Libby was probably one that would have returned the favor had he had the chance.

These days if you play ball with federal goverment they might shove the bat up your a**. Libby just wound on the other side of the bat than he was expecting. ouch

2007-03-07 18:28:55 · answer #2 · answered by NuncProTunc 3 · 0 0

I did not think they were trying to minify perjury so much as complaining about the liberal twist. You know the whole " loss for Bush & set back for war". This trial never had anything to do with the war - it was just a "trap" gone astray to get Cheney & the President. Perjury should be punished but Mr. talk show & book writer jury member could not possibly been fair in his judgement. He did not organize his plans for a book in less than 24 hrs & a non-conviction makes for a non-book.

Mister Wilson should keep his mouth shut if he did not plan to out his wife (who is a pencil pusher that no one cares about).
If at the appeal, he is convicted - sentence him.

I rechecked minfy's definition - to make less significate (that is what I thought too & it is)

2007-03-07 18:28:07 · answer #3 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 1 1

I'm a staunch conservative (slightly to the right of Attila the Hun and Rush Limbaugh), and though I disagree with the reason for Libby's trial, I agree that it's a strong negative for "us" to tout rules, then not live by them. Similar to evangelists (God, how I hate them!) always getting caught for various disgusting acts like child molesting, kiddie porn, money laundering, theft, etc.

After all, a lot of us hoped they'd jail one or both of the Clintons for THEIR many perjuries!

By the way, the word you were looking for was minimize.

; )

2007-03-07 18:27:16 · answer #4 · answered by The Avatar 3 · 1 0

Did they "Minify" when Clinton commited Perjury?
Libby was just a lynching.
Democrats are experienced at lynchings.

2007-03-07 18:25:06 · answer #5 · answered by wolf 6 · 0 1

could you please define "Minify"?

2007-03-07 18:20:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers