English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Alright, this question is a little weird. It''ll require some out-of-the-box thinking (literally) and speculation, so don't be afraid to say what's in your head.


So, lets say I subscribe to the theory that there exists multiple universes. And to make matters worse, I believe that our universe is very small relative to the other universes.

Basically, if you were able to remove yourself from the universe (lets assume the term "universe" describes our universe as a result of the big-bang only) and exponentially increase your size, what would be the properties of the universe, as a substance?

Would it be porous? Repulsive? Firm? Stringy? Sponge-worthy?! etc.

I know there's no RIGHT or WRONG answer, I'm just curious...

:)

2007-03-07 09:43:54 · 5 answers · asked by other_user 2 in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

5 answers

No one knows and as wierd as it sounds this is not far off from the latest thinking of physics. The only thing is we can't communicate with the other universes and the laws of physics may be diffrent there so even matter perhaps doesn't exist. Buck rogers here we come

2007-03-07 09:49:56 · answer #1 · answered by Gene 7 · 0 0

The universe did not go beyond into information. The universe has no cognition of itself, its motives, its outcomes, or its potential and ends. If spaghetti got here from flour, did wheat come from spaghetti? you should use good judgment at the same time as asking questions. The fastest way is to do what I merely did--insert distinct words on your words. it truly is why "A is A" works; because the first A is the article, thus "aspects of the universe," and the 2d A is the region, thus "aspects of information." Substituting words in note formulation is a time-venerated approach. If the formulation makes no sense with distinct words, the unique words received't artwork both.

2016-10-17 10:58:43 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I watched the film on Google/Thunderbolts and found it to be a shallow way of thinking. Just explains Mythology in a scientific terminology, with an expanded use of electricity and plasma.
I give it 2 thumbs up in music and photography.

On answering your Q., I can envision it like a gem stone, that is strong with optical illusions, and colors that are present that the Angels in Heaven can not count them all. It would be something you thirst for, and yet the mystery of it is so mind boggling that only God knows the answer, so he tells you all about it, just like your grandfather would do, with wit wisdom and fun.

2007-03-07 12:00:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Similar to Eugene N response, I believe the predominate theory is string theory to explain "parallel" universe's.

2007-03-07 10:02:18 · answer #4 · answered by finsfancb 2 · 0 0

unfortunately everthing youve been taught about the universe is a lie.
Here is the truth...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4773590301316220374

2007-03-07 10:42:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers