Well you'd have to be more careful to use protection if he wasn't circumcised (twice as likely to get STD's including AIDs and easier to transmit other infections). But you should be using protection anyways. The only studies I've read show that uncircumcised men have higher rates of sexual dysfunction....something worth considering.
Sara
2007-03-09 05:47:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Usually not at all.
Studies on circumcision in the US (where it is common) show improved health in the circumcised than in those not. Studies in Europe where it is rare find this effect to be absent.
Looks like it is a case of parents who opt for circumcision in the US do so on the advice of doctors which is not given in Europe. The sort of parents who take advice from medics on this will also take advice on good hygiene and on teaching their sons good hygiene. It is probabloy this that the studies are showing.
So it is not necessarily the case that circumcision is safer or cleaner. And it does not effect enjoyment. Europeans have sufficent fun in bed - explains why ther are so many of us.
2007-03-07 20:30:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Adrian F 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It doesn't drastically affect sex. However, uncircumcised men have more sensitivity, so can be stimulated in different ways. The foreskin acts both as a natural lubricant and as extra stimulation.
Men who were circumcised as babies are unaware of the reduced sensation, so it doesn't bother them. The only men who notice are those that were circumcised as adults, because they can compare the two.
2007-03-07 19:17:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
NOT being circucised will mean a better sexual experience for both man and woman! Take a look at http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html -- nine out of ten women say sex is better with an intact man.
Sex is better for the intact man because the foreskin protects his glans and keeps it sensitive. Also because chopping off the nerve-rich foreskin reduces sensation.
Often circumcised men become so desensitized that they cannot climax from intercourse and have to pull out and finish by hand. This is hard on relationships and the man's sense of self-worth.
Circumcision was popularized in the anti-sex Victorian era by a nutcase named Kellogg (yup, the cereal guy) who thought if it was done without anesthesia it would punish boys for masturbation and keep them from wanting to touch themselves. Kellogg also wanted to put carbolic acid on the clitoris of any girl caught masturbating. Enough to make you barf up your cornflakes just thinking about it.
When boys masturbated anyway, circumcision was justified by the sex-is-dirty crowd for "hygienic" purposes. Now that nearly all homes have running water, that doesn't hold either. A washed penis is clean, and an unwashed penis is not clean. Cleaning under the foreskin takes an extra 5 seconds a day. Foreskin is not in itself dirty!
For the best sexual experiences, don't amputate any healthy man parts. And keep carbolic acid off your clitoris, too.
2007-03-07 18:28:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Maple 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
LOL, I love how Americans are culturally brainwashed to think that an intact penis is constantly dirty (circumcision is not done to newborns in all other developed nations, only a few area, usually for religion). An uncircumcised penis is only dirty if the guy doesn't shower for days. Here in developed countries it isn't an issue; you slide it back and wash; it even feels good since you rub the head and and it only takes like five seconds. That has never been an issue with me.
If fact, being uncircumcised may be easier to give a handjob to, for example, since all you do is slide the foreskin up and down, and it rubs the head. And since it's moist inside like your eyelids; no lubricant is needed. =)
How it works:
http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/
http://www.twbookmark.com/books/70/0446678805/chapter_excerpt15690.html
2007-03-07 18:58:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jorge 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Uncircumsized have sex normally just like circumsized men. Being uncircumsized is not detrimental to a man´s sex life.
2007-03-07 17:56:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Double 709 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
For the man or for the woman? Personally I wouldnt have sex with a uncircumcised man. I don't care what others say about it, that it doesnt matter...well it matters to me. Circumcised is better. Its neat clean and sexy. A foreskin is just gross.
2007-03-08 17:33:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by cindy l 1
·
2⤊
2⤋
no it wont affect your sex life in any way
2007-03-07 18:17:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by hpnvidia000 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
no, it will be the same, when erect, cirsumsizewd and un-circumsized are pretty well the same
2007-03-07 18:02:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
no it want sex is sex getting circumsized will keep you cleaner
2007-03-07 17:57:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋