"Inelegant" is correct.
I provide below a link to the Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. It is an EXCELLENT free online dictionary that tells you all sorts of things that you need to know about words that most dictionaries don't. For example:
*Is a noun count (cow/cows) or noncount (hair, air, spaghetti)
*Which prepositions go with a certain word (should it be "compare with" or "compare to"?)
2007-03-07 09:35:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by xgravity23 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Inelegant is the Correct, just forget the first three answerers.
2007-03-07 09:39:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anry 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
although inelegant sounds better, think of the prefixes. In means is, like inflammable means flammable. Un menas not, like unimportant or unintelligant. I think that its most likely unelegant.
2007-03-07 09:37:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by cockadoodleDIE 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
inelegant
2007-03-07 09:35:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by soulguy85 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Unelegant, but you would be better off saying not elegant
2007-03-07 09:34:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Zhughu 2
·
0⤊
5⤋
i think the right word would be "unelegeant" i dont know for shure though.
2007-03-07 09:32:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by shy-girl 1
·
0⤊
5⤋
i don't think you can just shove an "in-" or "un-" in front of a word for it to mean "not." i would just stick to saying, "not elegant" or find an antonym, like casual or informal.
2007-03-07 09:35:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋