How Was The 9/11 Cover Story Sold To The Public?

Question

If a crime were committed and immediately afterwards "experts" appeared on the scene claiming knowledge that no one could possibly have about it what would you think?

Two major 9/11 anomalies have been thoroughly documented, specifically:

1) The stand down of US air defense on the morning of 9/11 that ... all » permitted commercial jet aircraft to fly erratically and in restricted air space without challenge

2) Overwhelming physical evidence that World Trade Center buildings #1, #2, and #7 were brought down by controlled demolition

A third significant anomaly has not been discussed, let alone acknowledged: the reporting by the major US TV news networks in the first few hours immediately after the attacks.

Specifically:

1. MSNBC presented an elaborately detailed story about the lifestyle and anti-US philosophy of Osama bin Laden - while both towers were still burning and long before Bin Laden had been accused by anyone.

2. Fox News featured a "man in the street" eye witness who explained in strangely formal language the science behind why the towers collapsed when most engineers and firemen were utterly baffled and in shock by what had just taken place.

3. CBS featured a Bush administration insider (and not identified as such) as a guest who actively worked to dissuade Dan Rather (and viewers) from speculating that there must have been explosive charges placed in the buildings for them to have collapsed the way they did.

How was it that these stories - based on no fact, no research and no inquirry - appeared in full blown form so quickly on US news networks and then became part of the core myths of what happened on 9/11?

Were these stories prepared in advance?

There's an old intelligence saying that "once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, but three times is enemy action."

Because most of these clips ran only once and were not repeated after, they'd done their job, making it difficult, if not impossible, for viewers to analyze them critically.

Now, thanks to the magic of video tape and a few people who immediately started taping the news after the attacks, we have this important evidence that at the very least these attacks appear to have been anticipated and prepared for by forces that have the ability to exert strong influence over the output of the newsrooms of major US news networks.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2792830342831749576&hl=en-GB

Answer 1

Anyone with a functioning brain can figure out that 9/11 was orchestrated with the collaboration of the US and Israel. All of these people who will throw insults at you for posing this question are either uninformed, misinformed or willfully subservient to their idiot leader.

The best new evidence of Mossad (Israeli secret service) false flag ops is the fact that the IED parts found were made by Zapata Co., a subsidiary of Zapata Oil, which operates out of TelAviv. (look up Zapata, you will see the Bushco links) You mean they are killing our soldiers to make it look like the Iraqi bad guys did it? Yes. It doesn't even end there. The two female soldiers that were investigating this lead were found with their throats slashed in a dumpster. And it goes on..........

Answer 2

First of all, Osama was the most famous terrorist at the time. When I first heard about 911, I ALSO ASSUMED it was Osama before there was any hard evidence. Most people did, so that really doesn't tell me anything.

2nd, there wasn't a stand-down to the air defense forces, there just wasn't enough time to figure out what was going on, especially because back then all the main security agencies worked very independently. People hesitated too much, that's all.

Third, there is not... I REPEAT... there is NOT overwhelming physical evidence for a controlled demolition. That's a bunch of BS that paranoid people came up with because it looked plausible.

Anyone with a mechanical engineering degree will tell that to do a controlled demolition like the one you are talking about requires a complete gutting of the building to make sure things fall exactly straight down, along with perfectly synchronized explosives placed throughout the building at many different places. It would have been a major undertaking that would have been easy to notice weeks in advance of 911.

Any real engineer will look at the evidence from the 911 report and have no problem with HOW the buildings fell...

Answer 3

I was at home watching TV when it happened. The first thing I noticed was the speed in which the "terrorists" photos were flashed on the screen. All of a sudden, the News was telling the American people that the culprits had already been found. All I could think was, "This looks too orchestrated." How could the government find out who these people were within minutes, when their ineptitude had allowed it to happen? Why were they not stopped, before taking control of those planes, if our government can nail them at such break neck speed?

I believe that the whole thing was done by rigging the computer controls inside those cockpits. There were no "terrorists" except our government, and possibly the Jewish owners of the buildings.

Answer 4

Sheeple People who refuse to accept the fact that the U.S. Government had their hand in the Terror Attacks of 911 are just plain ignorant. It's impossible for Jet fuel or Kerosene to melt iron...LOOK AT THE PERIODIC TABLE OF ELEMENTS. Also if the floors collapsed causing a chain reaction it would have taken well over 90 seconds for the buildings to come down. They came down at free fall speed....9 seconds. There is no logical argument here. Explosives were pre-planted in the building. Case closed! Some idiots will argue that the fires were raging hot inferno’s...however if that was the case then why were there people standing in the holes where the planes impacted waving for help? Their clothes weren’t even burnt. Here we are talking about the biggest crime scene in the history of the United States...and what did Guilani do?
He scooped up all the evidence and got rid of it as fast as he possibly could. Sent overseas to be recycled? I doubt it...my guess is they dumped it all in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.

If any of you people would for one second look at the evidence...it's a common tactic for a country to injure or attack itself and then blame it on the enemy. Then we can go get em. There is even a name for it...it’s called.. “Pretext for Military Intervention” Why don't all you wonderful wise little kids tell me why NORAD didn't scramble any fighters to escort the hijacked planes down? They didn't miss 1, but all 4!! Anytime a commercial airline goes off course without explanation, within 10 minutes, fighter jets are supposed to escort them down. Especially the air space over the Pentagon! Hmmm. How convenient. You think it was because Bush ordered Cheney to take control over NORAD the same morning of the attacks? Did you also know that the WTC changed owners about six months prior to the attacks? Did you also know that the buildings were worth more if destroyed than standing? That Larry Silverstein is the man who cashed out on the scam...walking away with billions? Did you know that there was a flurry of activity on Wall Street prior to the attacks, and the majority of the trading was “Put options” on the doomed Airlines stock? Did you know that there were multiple explosions heard inside the buildings from all kinds of firefighters, police officers and witnesses? Did you know that WTC Building 7 fell at approximately 5:30 p.m.? That the building did not suffer any major damage, but it somehow blew up into a fine pile of dust? Do you Morons even know what propaganda is? Do you know that it is also a well known and effectively used tool for the government to pull the wool over your eyes? Well, don't say we didn't warn you when your asking yourself 5 years from now "How could this happen?" It's sheeple people who make it easy for the government to do whatever they want. Educate yourself and open your eyes folks. This is real, and there are more than just a couple of us who think so. Go to google and type in Terror Attacks of 911...have yourself a look at all the choices there are to choose from.

Answer 5

before everything- that's no longer merely a republican or democratic failing on my own! Ask any professional in any field, and that they could inform you something which you ignorantly settle for in spite of the reality that this is untrue. This difficulty is quite extensive-unfold and adverse interior the area of politics, by way of fact whoever gets voted in can doubtlessly harm the rustic for the subsequent 4 (or 8) years, like President Bush has! if fact be told that media alongside with television or radio are so in many circumstances used and time-honored that it is the only way maximum folk study approximately what's occurring interior the extensive worldwide. maximum folk are not drawn to politics, and so while they pay attention that so-and-so flipped components, or that Mr. Whoever is going against his observe, they use that to vote. it is not properly-recommended democracy, and that's fairly media pushed. this is merely the way that somebody with little time or activity in politics may even see it. in case you have the desire to make greater recommended judgements, use the internet! you are able to look up as plenty airborne dirt and airborne dirt and dirt as you opt for for on the two candidate.

Answer 6

Actually all the evidence shows the towers fell two separate ways. Both countering a "controlled demolition". I think the cover story came out on live television for all to see. Some people just can't fathom this is and try looking for conspiracies. Instead of wasting their time they could be raising money for the victim's families.

Answer 7

VERY SIMPLE: After the 767 jet liner crashed into the world trade center building creating the worst terror attack in history, a fire burned for 56 minutes inside the World Trade Center building number two. The top 20 floors of the building collapsed on the 90 floors below. The entire one hundred and ten-story building collapsed in 8 seconds... After a fire burned inside WTC tower number one for 102 minutes, the top 30 floors collapsed on the lower 80 floors. And the entire one hundred and ten stories of this building collapsed in 10 seconds. You can say the reason they collapsed was they were struck with a 185 ton jet airliner and the 24,000 gallons of jet fuel caused a fire of 1500 to 2000 degrees F which weakened the steel and cause the collapse. ANY QUESTIONS????

Answer 8

Obviously the conspiracy gang forgot to explain when and how those well-placed explosives were brought into the buildings and concealed from the eyes of the hundreds of people who worked there.

To do the job that was required to collapse the two towers would take hundreds of hours by skilled workers. All of which seemingly escaped the notice of security guards and simple workers.

The conspiracy gang needs to re-wire their brains, somewhere along the way there was a short-circuit.

Answer 9

9/11 was a tragedy. All the building collapses were not controlled demolition.

For more info on demolition, go to Dallas Contracting Co., Inc. website

Answer 10

I am going to do this again and give you a dose of the evidence that WTC was not brought down by a controlled demolition.
Last time I did this some jerk reported me.
But I can't stand by and watch this myth keep going on without saying something.
Directly to your 2nd point:
2) Overwhelming physical evidence that World Trade Center buildings #1, #2, and #7 were brought down by controlled demolition

Read:
Engineers Explain WTC Collapse
http://www.architectureweek.com/2002/0529/news_3-1.html
Report Ties WTC Collapses to Column Failures
http://enr.construction.com/news/buildings/archives/040119.asp
IT WAS THE FIRE, CAUSED THE TWIN TOWER COLLAPSE - icivilengineer.com
http://www.icivilengineer.com/News/WTC/Fire.html
Simulation for the collapse of WTC after aeroplane impact - Lu XZ., Yang N., Jiang JJ. Structure Engineer, 66(sup.). 2003, 18-22
Bazant, Z.P., & Zhou, Y.
"Addendum to 'Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? - Simple Analysis" (pdf)
Journal of Engineering Mechanics v. 128, no. 3, (2002): 369-370.
Brannigan, F.L.
"WTC: Lightweight Steel and High-Rise Buildings"
Fire Engineering v.155, no. 4, (2002): 145-150.
Clifton, Charles G.
Elaboration on Aspects of the Postulated Collapse of the World Trade Centre Twin Towers
HERA: Innovation in Metals. 2001. 13 December 2001.
"Construction and Collapse Factors"
Fire Engineering v.155, no. 10, (2002): 106-108.
Corbett, G.P.
"Learning and Applying the Lessons of the WTC Disaster"
Fire Engineering v.155, no. 10, (2002.): 133-135.
"Dissecting the Collapses"
Civil Engineering ASCE v. 72, no. 5, (2002): 36-46.
Eagar, T.W., & Musso, C.
"Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation"
JOM v. 53, no. 12, (2001): 8-12.
Federal Emergency Management Agency, Therese McAllister, report editor.
World Trade Center Building Performance Study: Data Collection, Preliminary Observations, and Recommendations
(also available on-line)
Gabrielson, T.B., Poese, M.E., & Atchley, A.A.
"Acoustic and Vibration Background Noise in the Collapsed Structure of the World Trade Center"
The Journal of Acoustical Society of America v. 113, no. 1, (2003): 45-48.
Glover, N.J.
"Collapse Lessons"
Fire Engineering v. 155, no. 10, (2002): 97-103
Marechaux, T.G.
"TMS Hot Topic Symposium Examines WTC Collapse and Building Engineering"
JOM, v. 54, no. 4, (2002): 13-17.
Monahan, B.
"World Trade Center Collapse-Civil Engineering Considerations"
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction v. 7, no. 3, (2002): 134-135.
Newland, D.E., & Cebon, D.
"Could the World Trade Center Have Been Modified to Prevent Its Collapse?"
Journal of Engineering Mechanics v. 128, no. 7, (2002):795-800.
National Instititue of Stamdards and Technology: Congressional and Legislative Affairs
“Learning from 9/11: Understanding the Collapse of the World Trade Center”
Statement of Dr. Arden L. Bement, Jr., before Committee of Science House of Representatives, United States Congress on March 6, 2002.
Pinsker, Lisa, M.
"Applying Geology at the World Trade Center Site"
Geotimes v. 46, no. 11, (2001).
The print copy has 3-D images.
Public Broadcasting Station (PBS)
Why the Towers Fell: A Companion Website to the Television Documentary.
NOVA (Science Programming On Air and Online)
Post, N.M.
"No Code Changes Recommended in World Trade Center Report"
ENR v. 248, no. 14, (2002): 14.
Post, N.M.
"Study Absolves Twin Tower Trusses, Fireproofing"
ENR v. 249, no. 19, (2002): 12-14.
The University of Sydney, Department of Civil Engineering
World Trade Center - Some Engineering Aspects
A resource site.
"WTC Engineers Credit Design in Saving Thousands of Lives"
ENR v. 247, no. 16, (2001): 12.
The Towers Lost and Beyond
http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Eduardo Kausel, John E. Fernandez, Tomasz Wierzbicki, Liang Xue, Meg Hendry-Brogan, Ahmed F. Ghoniem, Oral Buyukozturk, Franz-Josef Ulm, Yossi Sheffi