The trouble with thinking 9/11 was an inside job staged by George W. Bush & Co. is that it defies belief any U.S. president might be capable of such an iniquitous crime against his own people.
Yet, subsequent Bush actions, such as lying the nation into war against Iraq, makes one wonder if the man didn’t create the 9/11 massacres to justify his attacks on Afghanistan, Iraq, and Iran.
After all, his record reveals him to be a serial liar, warmonger, tyrant, torturer, and usurper of his peoples’ civil liberties. Just off the top, here are some illegal GWB actions that betray what he is really about.
2007-03-07
08:13:00
·
32 answers
·
asked by
eatmeneocon
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
# Bush lied the U.S. into what former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan called an “illegal” war on Iraq. This conflict has killed 650,000 civilians, wounded over a million more, drove nearly 2-million from their country, and turned life into a living hell for the rest. The death toll there is already equal to about 240 WTC massacres, yet Bush persists in waging the war.
# Bush okayed $1.5-trillion for new weapons' research including grisly weapons that would thrill mad scientists, such as sound waves that crush a victim's internal organs. Another gem is "rods from god" to hurl tungsten poles down from Earth orbit down upon its victims at 7,200 miles an hour, striking with the atomic fury. He is illegally militarizing space. These are not the dreams of a humanist.
2007-03-07
08:13:19 ·
update #1
# Bush has allowed illegal radioactive ammunition fired in Afghanistan and Iraq that poison civilian populations and U.S. troops, as well as cluster bombs. Does this evince concern for human life?
# Bush has made himself master of the greatest spy apparatus the world has ever known at a cost to taxpayers of $50-billion annually. He authorized NSA to spy illegally on Americans, allegedly to catch terrorists. If this was the true reason, why did he also eavesdrop on UN officials?
2007-03-07
08:13:42 ·
update #2
# Bush authorized CIA agents to go to foreign countries to kidnap "suspects" and dump them in distant prisons to be tortured with no warrants signed to seize them, no charges brought against them, and no lawyers to defend them. In his secret prisons there may be many thousands held illegally, and tortured, while all the time he lies to the world "we don't torture." Is this a man with empathy for others?
# Bush is also funding hundreds of biotechnology labs to create deadly strains of exotic killer diseases at a cost to taxpayers of $40-billion. Many operate in secret, illegally violating transparency rules. On Bush’s watch, anthrax germs from a military laboratory in Fort Detrick, Md., were mysteriously unleashed upon two of his political opponents in the U.S. Senate that killed five people and sickened 17 others and temporarily shut down the Congress.
2007-03-07
08:14:13 ·
update #3
Peculiarly, the perpetrators of the anthrax panic and the massacres at the WTC and Pentagon have not been caught. “Why not?” Is it just possible the White House doesn’t want the killers apprehended?
For all these, and many other reasons, it’s worth hearing out the arguments of those who claim the 9/11 events were staged by the White House to rush a frightened nation into war.
In the March/April issue of "Tikkun", a bimonthly "Jewish Critique of of Politics, Culture & Society," author Dr. David Ray Griffin asserts the Administration never proved the 9/11 attacks were made by Osama bin Laden. Griffin, a professor of philosophy and theology at Claremont Graduate College, Calif., and author of “The New Pearl Harbor”(Olive Branch Press) writes the FBI has “no hard evidence” of his culpability.
2007-03-07
08:14:53 ·
update #4
Griffin asks why WTC building 7, not struck by an airplane, collapsed upon itself in the same manner as buildings 1 and 2, why no steel remained standing? And he notes steel does not melt until it reaches 2800 degrees F. and the jet fuel used by the airliners that hit WTC burned at only 1700 F.
Collapse of the three towers, he said, “manifested many standard features of the kind of controlled demolition known as implosion, such as: sudden onset; straight-down collapse; collapse at virtually free-fall speed, indicating the lower floors were offering no resistance; total collapse, indicating that the massive steel columns in the core of each building had been broken into many pieces; the production of molten metal, and the concurrence of multiple explosions.”
2007-03-07
08:15:30 ·
update #5
“Dozens of people, including journalists, police officers, WTC employees, emergency medical workers, and fire-fighters reported hearing explosions in the Twin Towers,” Griffin writes. One fire captain said he heard a series of explosions from the top floor down, one after another, “boom, boom, boom.” And a paramedic described them as akin to a “professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear ‘Pop, pop, pop, pop.”
“Complete collapses of steel-frame high-rise buildings have never been brought about by fire plus externally caused structural damage,” Griffin tells “Tikkun” readers. “Such collapses have only been caused by explosives used in controlled demolitions.”
2007-03-07
08:15:53 ·
update #6
If you wonder how saboteurs might plant explosives in the three WTC towers without being detected, Griffin notes on Web site “9.11 Truth” President Bush’s brother Marvin and his cousin Wirt Walker III “were both principals in the company in charge of security for WTC.” The firm, Securacom, was also responsible for electronic security at United Airlines, whose flights struck WTC.
Among Griffin’s charges, the most startling may be that Osama bin Laden, who was already one of America’s “most wanted” criminals, was treated in July, 2001 --- two months before 9/11 --- in the American Hospital in Dubai, and visited by the local CIA agent.
2007-03-07
08:16:16 ·
update #7
Does this explain why bin Laden was not caught and likely never will be caught? Is it possible this “renegade” from a prominent Saudi Arabian family having long ties to President Bush Sr. is in fact a fall guy whose alleged crimes gave Bush an excuse to invade Afghanistan and Iraq?
Congress needs to conduct a real investigation of 9/11. It may not only uncover ample grounds for impeachment but for criminal prosecution. Given GWB’s track record for criminal activity, treason cannot be ruled out.
2007-03-07
08:16:45 ·
update #8
Well said!!!! I can see that you are not influenced by the undermining of our current leadership. Scooter Libby and now with Newt Gingrich to top it all off with his hypocrisy affair while scrutinizing Bill Clinton for a BJ is just way too much. Cheney is on fire right now, and has a lot of explaining to do.
2007-03-10 23:50:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by leonard bruce 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
By Arthur Scheverman, Batt. Chief FDNY (Retired)
To enter the debate as to whether the plane crashes or the resultant fires caused the collapse of World Trade Center Towers I and 2, I would like to weigh in on the side of the fires. These buildings were designed to take the impacts of large plane crashes, and I doubt whether either building would have collapsed and whether multitudes of people would have been trapped above the crash floors except for the fire, smoke and heat. Apparently the effects of the inevitable explosion and fire after the simulated plane crashes were not considered in the design of the building. The point is; these buildings didn’t immediately collapse, they took almost an hour for Tower 2 and well over an hour for Tower 1 the North Tower to collapse. According to Ronald Hamburger a structural engineer investigating the disaster, “We have reason to believe that, without the fire, the buildings could have stood indefinitely and been repaired.” The fire caused most of the life loss and building damage and the buildings were evidently deficient in fire protection. Further on in the report it gives the times of the collapse at one hour and longer.
2007-03-07 08:39:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by ohbrother 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Where to start –
Facts:
Kofi Annan? The same man who “attempted” to cover up the mass raping of African children by his so called “peace keepers”, diverted $1.5 billion in kickbacks to Saddam Hussein for the so called “oil for food” program, and attempted to wipe Israel off the face of the map? This is the person you quote?
Okay Einstein, back up your claim that Bush Okayed 1.5 TRILLION for new weapons research– do you realize how stupid that accusation sounds when the entire cost of the Iraq War is estimated to be about 2 Trillion? Search for “facts” and then repeat things back to yourself to see how stupid they sound before you put them in writing.
Okay idiot – my husband is a targeting officer in Afghanistan and has been there for two separate 14 month tours. He is not glowing. There is no “illegal radioactive ammunition” fired anywhere in Afghanistan unless it something being supplied to terrorists by Iran and nobody on the planet – saving yourself – knows anything about it.
I don’t blame Bush for ease dropping on the United Nations – it is the most corrupt organization on the planet.
You want us to have empathy for terrorists? You’re kidding, right? How do you empathize with someone that wants you dead? Are you Emo?
Bush is unleashing anthrax on political opponents? I am thinking he would have started with John Kerry, but then that would have been too obvious – right? You are crazy.
Dr. David Ray Griffin who? A professor of philosophy and theology is now an expert on engineering? By the way…you might find the fact that the Presbyterian Publishing House “disavowed” this book as being “suspicious” and as having problems that they did not investigate PRIOR to publishing it. To be clear – The publishing company of Dr. David Ray Griffin’s book on 9/11 has been publicly humiliated for not doing their research prior to allowing such irresponsible claims to be published.
I was not aware that engineers had conducted tests using multi-story steel structured buildings and jet liners – can you elaborate?
That is enough for now…..do your homework.
2007-03-15 06:51:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Terrie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I absolutly agree
Bush is a MORON...he had so many people telling him about 9/11. The central intellegence agency, for example, told him about it too. He tried to connect saddam hussein and osama bin laden so that he could invade the middle east when osama was the only one behind it. He WANTED to go into the middle east so he could get an advantage in oil...he even said once"we're gonna get those f-ing Iraqis". Bush has and IQ of a duck. he even said " I belive that the human being and fish can co-exist peacefully". People say that he is the worst president in the history of the United States...I belive it with all my heart. How long have we been in Iraq? Far too long. Of course we can't pull out because that would ruin everything but we need to change th strategy or do something better...He even blew up frogs with firecrackers when he was younger. He never was in the army. His father is dissaproving of what he is doing, and he is acting suprised about Walter Reed. He even had interviewers in there and told them to interview only people who were willing to say positive things...
2007-03-10 13:09:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Charlotte 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
It does make one suspicious. However, while the Bush Administration or Bush himself did not plan and orchestrate 9/11, it can be said that they allowed it to happen. Even after briefings by the outgoing administration told them about Al Qaeda and Osama and what was likely to happen, the Bush people chose to ignore it and go their own way. There are couple of books I found very informing on this issue. I recommend others read them. I get nothing for recommending them but the satisfaction that the truth is being told. Both are well documented so it is not just the author's opinion.
They are both available at Bn and Amazon
2007-03-07 08:27:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
No, you're incorrect. i do no longer understand the thank you to be any nicer than that. they do no longer seem to be genuine by technique of any means. a million. I guess he renewed his coverage because of the fact he mandatory to. 2. there have been signs and indicators of the airplane hitting the pentagon, eye wittness bills, and what no longer. Plus there have been airplane products. 3. nicely, i already spoke back that one 4. because of the fact, this is the way issues artwork, my severe college used to do those, even unannounced to the teachers 5. He grew to become into no longer shocked because of the fact he stored his composure, he had to think of roughly what that meant,(whether it grew to become into an twist of destiny or terrorists). in user-friendly terms after the 1st one he did no longer act all shocked, the 2nd he have been given a completly new seem on his face. 6. there have been no bombs ok. i will describe. The smoke popping out is debris from the burden of the superb suited area of the construction crushing something of the construction below. case in point, prepare a cheeseburger, positioned some ketchup and mustard below the superb suited patty. Now destroy it with you hand, yet do it puzzling to simulate the stress of the WTC. word how the ketchup and/or mustard comes out? comparable physics 7. i do no longer think you, in any respect, there are actually not any genuine info on that. 8. that doesn't advise you carry no prejudice against the hundreds lifeless after the assaults. Google "screw unfastened exchange", in basic terms attempt it considering the fact which you already observed unfastened exchange, have confidence me, you're regrettably wrong, i grew to become into additionally as quickly as, till i individually did the examine, no longer examining issues off of conspiracy web pages. i did no longer think of i might ever consider Neddie, yet she is physically powerful, OSAMA BIN encumbered!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2016-09-30 08:35:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by benisek 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some people don't get that, although we are enlightened and can view the world and actions through our educated and peaceful eyes, there are vicious animal out there who need to be dealt with in a savage manner. It doesn't matter if you love peace and understand that there is a solution to all of the conflicts on the Earth. What matters is that there are people who don't care about your enlightenment or solutions, they are vicious animals who need to be treated as such.
2007-03-07 08:26:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by damo 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think we've found the restaurant, and we've seen President Bush walk inside... Now we need to see who all is at the table. He is not alone, and quite possibly is just a pawn. I don't think we'll find him at the head of the table. I think the guest list is long, bi-partisan, and made up of people willing to do anything to have the ultimate power.
2007-03-15 08:24:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by seattleogre 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It sure does suggest a role in the 9/11 attacks. It also suggests that he knows where Elvis is! Get serious!
2007-03-15 05:25:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by edward m 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with you that Bush is corrupt, incompetent, a liar, and a traitor. He deliberately ignored evidence that Al Qaeda was plotting an attack - and when they hit - deliberately ignored the evidence they were being supported by Pakistan and the Saudi/UAE royal families - instead focusing our retaliation on Iraq.
But I don't think this means he was behind 9/11. I just think he was unsurprised when it happened - and quite likely happy about it - because he knew it was his blank check to consolidate his power and implement the full neoconservative (PNAC) foreign policy agenda, particularly the invasion of Iraq.
It's not worth going through all your conspiracy allegations. Many have been trivially disproven. For example, the WTC 7 conspiracy theorists routinely ignore the fact that a huge multi-story chunk of the bottom corner of WTC 7 was destroyed by falling debris from WTC 1 and 2. It collapsed primarily due to that structural damage.
2007-03-07 08:22:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mark P 5
·
2⤊
4⤋